better provider name

Author: aignas

python/uv/private/lock.bzl

@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ visibility(["//..."])
 _uv_toolchain = Label("//python/uv:uv_toolchain_type")
 _py_toolchain = Label("//python:toolchain_type")
 
-_LockInfo = provider(
+_RunLockInfo = provider(
     doc = "",
     fields = {
         "args": "",
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ def _lock_impl(ctx):
 
     return [
         DefaultInfo(files = depset([output])),
-        _LockInfo(
+        _RunLockInfo(
             args = run_args + args,
             srcs = srcs,
             uv = uv,
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ script depending on what the target platform is executed on.
 )
 
 def _lock_run_impl(ctx):
-    info = ctx.attr.lock[_LockInfo]
+    info = ctx.attr.lock[_RunLockInfo]
     uv = info.uv
     srcs = info.srcs
     py_runtime = info.py
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ _lock_run = rule(
     attrs = {
         "lock": attr.label(
             doc = "The lock target that is doing locking in a build action.",
-            providers = [_LockInfo],
+            providers = [_RunLockInfo],
         ),
         "output": attr.string(
             doc = "The output that we would be updated.",