SUPPORT: Adding detail on targets that are supported #850
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
WalkthroughA multi-line comment was added at the top of the Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
Note 🔌 MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available in Early Access!Pro users can now connect to remote MCP servers under the Integrations page to get reviews and chat conversations that understand additional development context. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
configs/SPEDIXG473/config.h (1)
22-25: Comment-only change looks good; consider clarifying the reference and standardizing the template
- Placement above
#pragma onceis fine; no functional impact.- Suggest labeling the hash (e.g., “SHA-256:” or “Ref ID:”) and adopting a single canonical comment template across supported targets for consistency and grep-ability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
configs/SPEDIXG473/config.h(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (7)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: ot0tot
PR: betaflight/config#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T04:33:57.480Z
Learning: Always verify that the BOARD_NAME define in each config.h matches the directory name it resides in (e.g., configs/AXISFLYINGF7AIO/config.h must have #define BOARD_NAME AXISFLYINGF7AIO). This check is required for all Betaflight board configuration reviews.
Learnt from: haslinghuis
PR: betaflight/config#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T15:17:30.040Z
Learning: In Betaflight configurations, when a target name suggests dual IMUs (like JHEF7DUAL) but specific hardware variants only have one gyro available, the preferred solution is to use DEFAULT_GYRO_TO_USE macro to specify which gyro to use by default rather than pruning gyro defines or creating redundant configurations. This approach maintains compatibility when the same target is used by multiple hardware variants from the same manufacturer.
Learnt from: haslinghuis
PR: betaflight/config#835
File: configs/HDZERO_HALO_MPU6000/config.h:44-56
Timestamp: 2025-07-14T16:16:56.822Z
Learning: For Betaflight board configurations of boards already in production, pin assignments in config.h files reflect the actual hardware design and cannot be changed, even if they present potential conflicts with debug interfaces. The configuration must match the physical board layout, not ideal software design preferences.
Learnt from: haslinghuis
PR: betaflight/config#835
File: configs/HDZERO_HALO_MPU6000/config.h:29-35
Timestamp: 2025-07-14T16:16:50.628Z
Learning: GYRO_1_SPI_CLOCK_DIVIDER is not used in any Betaflight target configuration files. SPI clock frequency settings are not commonly configured at the target level.
Learnt from: haslinghuis
PR: betaflight/config#792
File: configs/FLYWOOF411/config.h:33-33
Timestamp: 2025-05-28T15:48:18.449Z
Learning: The FLYWOOF411 board does not actually use dual gyros despite having GYRO_2_SPI_INSTANCE defined in its configuration. It was incorrectly targeted for GYRO_COUNT and dual gyro support.
Learnt from: ot0tot
PR: betaflight/config#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T04:33:57.480Z
Learning: Always verify that the `BOARD_NAME` define in config.h files exactly matches the directory name where the config file is located. For example, if the config file is in configs/AXISFLYINGF7AIO/config.h, then the BOARD_NAME should be defined as "AXISFLYINGF7AIO". This ensures proper board identification and configuration loading in Betaflight.
Learnt from: haslinghuis
PR: betaflight/config#814
File: configs/JHEF405PRO/config.h:109-109
Timestamp: 2025-06-08T22:02:28.961Z
Learning: The JHEF405PRO board does not actually use dual gyros despite having GYRO_2_SPI_INSTANCE defined in its configuration. It should not receive GYRO_COUNT or other dual-gyro related definitions since only the first gyro is supported.
Learnt from: haslinghuis
PR: betaflight/config#792
File: configs/MERAKRCF722/config.h:32-32
Timestamp: 2025-05-28T15:45:15.608Z
Learning: The presence of GYRO_2_SPI_INSTANCE definition in a board config does not necessarily mean the board uses dual gyros. Some boards have GYRO_2_SPI_INSTANCE defined but it's not actually used, so they should not receive GYRO_COUNT or other dual-gyro related definitions. Only boards that actually utilize dual gyros should get these definitions.
Learnt from: haslinghuis
PR: betaflight/config#656
File: configs/IFLIGHT_F745_AIO/config.h:31-35
Timestamp: 2025-07-28T16:44:59.686Z
Learning: In Betaflight board configurations, when a board design uses the same physical gyro socket but different sensor variants across production batches (e.g., MPU6000 in older batches, ICM42688P in newer batches), the correct approach is to enable both sensor drivers (USE_GYRO_SPI_MPU6000 and USE_GYRO_SPI_ICM42688P) in the same configuration. This allows runtime auto-detection of which sensor is actually present without requiring separate board configurations for each hardware variant.
📚 Learning: 2025-07-03T04:33:57.480Z
Learnt from: ot0tot
PR: betaflight/config#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T04:33:57.480Z
Learning: Always verify that the BOARD_NAME define in each config.h matches the directory name it resides in (e.g., configs/AXISFLYINGF7AIO/config.h must have #define BOARD_NAME AXISFLYINGF7AIO). This check is required for all Betaflight board configuration reviews.
Applied to files:
configs/SPEDIXG473/config.h
📚 Learning: 2025-07-14T16:16:50.628Z
Learnt from: haslinghuis
PR: betaflight/config#835
File: configs/HDZERO_HALO_MPU6000/config.h:29-35
Timestamp: 2025-07-14T16:16:50.628Z
Learning: GYRO_1_SPI_CLOCK_DIVIDER is not used in any Betaflight target configuration files. SPI clock frequency settings are not commonly configured at the target level.
Applied to files:
configs/SPEDIXG473/config.h
📚 Learning: 2025-07-03T15:17:30.040Z
Learnt from: haslinghuis
PR: betaflight/config#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T15:17:30.040Z
Learning: In Betaflight configurations, when a target name suggests dual IMUs (like JHEF7DUAL) but specific hardware variants only have one gyro available, the preferred solution is to use DEFAULT_GYRO_TO_USE macro to specify which gyro to use by default rather than pruning gyro defines or creating redundant configurations. This approach maintains compatibility when the same target is used by multiple hardware variants from the same manufacturer.
Applied to files:
configs/SPEDIXG473/config.h
📚 Learning: 2025-07-14T16:16:56.822Z
Learnt from: haslinghuis
PR: betaflight/config#835
File: configs/HDZERO_HALO_MPU6000/config.h:44-56
Timestamp: 2025-07-14T16:16:56.822Z
Learning: For Betaflight board configurations of boards already in production, pin assignments in config.h files reflect the actual hardware design and cannot be changed, even if they present potential conflicts with debug interfaces. The configuration must match the physical board layout, not ideal software design preferences.
Applied to files:
configs/SPEDIXG473/config.h
📚 Learning: 2025-05-28T15:48:18.449Z
Learnt from: haslinghuis
PR: betaflight/config#792
File: configs/FLYWOOF411/config.h:33-33
Timestamp: 2025-05-28T15:48:18.449Z
Learning: The FLYWOOF411 board does not actually use dual gyros despite having GYRO_2_SPI_INSTANCE defined in its configuration. It was incorrectly targeted for GYRO_COUNT and dual gyro support.
Applied to files:
configs/SPEDIXG473/config.h
📚 Learning: 2025-06-08T22:02:28.961Z
Learnt from: haslinghuis
PR: betaflight/config#814
File: configs/JHEF405PRO/config.h:109-109
Timestamp: 2025-06-08T22:02:28.961Z
Learning: The JHEF405PRO board does not actually use dual gyros despite having GYRO_2_SPI_INSTANCE defined in its configuration. It should not receive GYRO_COUNT or other dual-gyro related definitions since only the first gyro is supported.
Applied to files:
configs/SPEDIXG473/config.h
🔇 Additional comments (1)
configs/SPEDIXG473/config.h (1)
30-30: BOARD_NAME matches directory name
BOARD_NAMEisSPEDIXG473and the file resides inconfigs/SPEDIXG473/. Alignment confirmed.
nerdCopter
approved these changes
Aug 11, 2025
haslinghuis
approved these changes
Aug 11, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This will be a comment suggested for those targets that receive support from the crew, either because we feel the target is a reference target, or that the manufacturer has contributed to the review process (and cloud build costs where applicable).
Targets with a valid reference will be prioritized in the output from the build API in the list of targets.
Summary by CodeRabbit