Need any new co-maintainers?

[patcon]

No pressure. Just curious. I prefer to operate within a process where nothing gets merged until there's a +1 vote of confidence from a co-maintainer, so you wouldn't have to worry about me going overboard :)

(And fwiw, in case you're looking at my PR's and not liking them, I'll admit that I tend to be way more liberal with my PR's changes when I'm not the maintainer. When I am a maintainer, I feel less pressure to get multiple things into single PR's, as I can merge my own individual ones once +1's have been given)

[linc01n]

I am thinking we need a process if we have more than 1 maintainer in this project. I like the +1 approach.

@bflad Would you mind adding one more maintainer to this project?

[patcon]

Hey @bflad, I think I'm going to need push access in order to get #108 working, if you have a sec to consider. (I need push access to add the encrypted api key to travis.)

[bflad]

I have granted @patcon push access just now. Thank you both!

[patcon]

Thanks a bunch!