Skip to content

Commit e0233bc

Browse files
authored
summaries 2017-06-01
1 parent aee7cdb commit e0233bc

File tree

1 file changed

+93
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+93
-0
lines changed
Lines changed: 93 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
1+
---
2+
title: IRC meeting summary for 2017-06-01
3+
permalink: /en/meetings/2017/06/01/
4+
name: 2017-06-01-meeting
5+
type: meetings
6+
layout: page
7+
lang: en
8+
version: 1
9+
---
10+
{% include _toc.html %}
11+
12+
- [Link to this week logs](https://botbot.me/freenode/bitcoin-core-dev/2017-06-01/?msg=86677749&page=2)
13+
- [Meeting minutes by meetbot](http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-core-dev/2017/bitcoin-core-dev.2017-06-01-19.00.html)
14+
15+
---
16+
17+
## Notes / short topics
18+
19+
- Luke-jr raises the concern that blocks cause DoS penalties for invalid prev-blocks and for sending headers that "don't" connect (because we rejected an earlier invalid header), which might be a problem for softforks. There's been a different [issue][#9530] raised before around DoS protection, which might have similar solutions. Therefore Sdaftuar recommends to continue the discussion in [#9530][].
20+
- Everything for 0.14.2 is backported and merged, so 0.14.2 can be tagged for release and RC1 can be created.
21+
22+
## Main topics
23+
24+
- High priority features for 0.15
25+
26+
## High priority features for 0.15
27+
28+
### background
29+
30+
Bitcoin Core 0.15 is scheduled for release around 2017-09-01. Sdaftuar wants to talk about which features should get high priority for the 0.15 release.
31+
32+
### meeting comments
33+
34+
- Jtimon would like to get his PR [#8994][] (testchains) in.
35+
- Sdaftuar would like to see BlueMatt's [#10192][] (script cache) go in, as it is a huge validation win. Luke-jr notes it might be problematic for his proposed future softforks where script features require chain-context like [CHECKBLOCKVERSION](https://github.com/luke-jr/bips/blob/bip-cbv/bip-cbv.mediawiki) and possibly [CHECKBLOCKATHEIGHT](https://github.com/luke-jr/bips/blob/bip-cbah/bip-cbah.mediawiki). Sipa thinks it's solvable by storing the context-dependent script validation flags along with the entry in the cache.
36+
- Cfields wonders if removing openSSL for 0.15 is still a goal. Sipa thinks it shouldn't be a priority, but that it should happen eventually. It will probably come naturally once the pseudorandom number generator has undergone a few more improvements
37+
38+
## High priority review
39+
40+
- Jonasschnelli wants to have PR [#10240][] (HD wallet auto-restore) in Bitcoin Core 0.15.
41+
- Jtimon still asks for PR [#10339][] (Calculate block hash less times) to be reviewed.
42+
- Sipa is currently squashing PR [#10195][] ( Switch chainstate db and cache to per-txout model) and would like to request review on PR [#10321][] (Use FastRandomContext for all tests) after that.
43+
- Ryanofsky wants to add [#10244][], however that should be done after the multiwallet base gets in.
44+
- Jtimon notes [#7729][] (label API for wallet) needs a rebase. Gmaxwell worries it might be difficult to extend the API later to support multiple labels per transaction. Jonasschnelli clarifies it can be extended perfectly, but we should get it done as we've been talking about deprecating the account system for a long time now.
45+
46+
## Comic relief
47+
48+
{% highlight text %}
49+
jtimon other super fast topic?
50+
jonasschnelli Bitcoin Core ICO?
51+
jonasschnelli *duck*
52+
wumpus jonasschnelli: lol
53+
jtimon testnet 4 ico at most
54+
luke-jr jonasschnelli: IHO instead?
55+
luke-jr (Initial Hat Offering)
56+
sipa commits the Bitcoin Core.ico file
57+
gmaxwell We could sell international reply coupons... it would have a lot more substance than most ICOs. :)
58+
{% endhighlight %}
59+
60+
## Participants
61+
62+
| IRC nick | Name/Nym |
63+
|-----------------|---------------------------|
64+
| jonasschnelli | [Jonas Schnelli][] |
65+
| sipa | [Pieter Wuille][] |
66+
| cfields | [Cory Fields][] |
67+
| luke-jr | [Luke Dashjr][] |
68+
| kanzure | [Bryan Bishop][] |
69+
| gmaxwell | [Gregory Maxwell][] |
70+
| wumpus | [Wladimir van der Laan][] |
71+
| morcos | [Alex Morcos][] |
72+
| sdaftuar | [Suhas Daftuar][] |
73+
| jtimon | [Jorge Timón][] |
74+
| BlueMatt | [Matt Corallo][] |
75+
| instagibbs | [Gregory Sanders][] |
76+
| ryanofsky | [Russell Yanofsky][] |
77+
| achow101 | [Andrew Chow][] |
78+
79+
## Disclaimer
80+
81+
This summary was compiled without input from any of the participants in the discussion, so any errors are the fault of the summary author and not the discussion participants.
82+
83+
[#10240]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10240
84+
[#10339]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10339
85+
[#10195]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10195
86+
[#10321]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10321
87+
[#10244]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10244
88+
[#7729]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7729
89+
[#8994]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8994
90+
[#10192]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10192
91+
[#9530]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9530
92+
93+
{% include _references.md %}

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)