Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24799: Add test case mimicking issue 24765

395767e Add test case mimicking issue 24765 (Pieter Wuille)

Pull request description:

  This adds a functional test for the concern brought up in #24765. It turned out to be a non-issue, but since I wrote it anyway, it can't hurt to add it.

Top commit has no ACKs.

Tree-SHA512: fc8d57129d8c68f6d9a41b94b5ff676c87b31f53bc958195d4fe312530ec3e038ebd0bc5e8b9d56be77b7b63fd94574685901901404a4ab8726a5e09d89e86c8

Author: MacroFake

test/functional/feature_taproot.py

@@ -1131,6 +1131,12 @@ def predict_sigops_ratio(n, dummy_size):
         tap = taproot_construct(pubs[0], scripts)
         add_spender(spenders, "alwaysvalid/notsuccessx", tap=tap, leaf="op_success", inputs=[], standard=False, failure={"leaf": "normal"}) # err_msg differs based on opcode
 
+    # == Test case for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24765 ==
+
+    zero_fn = lambda h: bytes([0 for _ in range(32)])
+    tap = taproot_construct(pubs[0], [("leaf", CScript([pubs[1], OP_CHECKSIG, pubs[1], OP_CHECKSIGADD, OP_2, OP_EQUAL])), zero_fn])
+    add_spender(spenders, "case24765", tap=tap, leaf="leaf", inputs=[getter("sign"), getter("sign")], key=secs[1], no_fail=True)
+
     # == Legacy tests ==
 
     # Also add a few legacy spends into the mix, so that transactions which combine taproot and pre-taproot spends get tested too.