You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
a733dd7 Remove unused function `reliesOnAssumedValid` (Suhas Daftuar)
d4a11ab Cache block index entry corresponding to assumeutxo snapshot base blockhash (Suhas Daftuar)
3556b85 Move CheckBlockIndex() from Chainstate to ChainstateManager (Suhas Daftuar)
0ce805b Documentation improvements for assumeutxo (Ryan Ofsky)
768690b Fix initialization of setBlockIndexCandidates when working with multiple chainstates (Suhas Daftuar)
d43a1f1 Tighten requirements for adding elements to setBlockIndexCandidates (Suhas Daftuar)
d0d40ea Move block-storage-related logic to ChainstateManager (Suhas Daftuar)
3cfc753 test: Clear block index flags when testing snapshots (Suhas Daftuar)
272fbc3 Update CheckBlockIndex invariants for chains based on an assumeutxo snapshot (Suhas Daftuar)
10c0571 Add wrapper for adding entries to a chainstate's block index candidates (Suhas Daftuar)
471da5f Move block-arrival information / preciousblock counters to ChainstateManager (Suhas Daftuar)
1cfc887 Remove CChain dependency in node/blockstorage (Suhas Daftuar)
fe86a7c Explicitly track maximum block height stored in undo files (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
This PR proposes a clean up of the relationship between block storage and the chainstate objects, by moving the decision of whether to store a block on disk to something that is not chainstate-specific. Philosophically, the decision of whether to store a block on disk is related to validation rules that do not require any UTXO state; for anti-DoS reasons we were using some chainstate-specific heuristics, and those have been reworked here to achieve the proposed separation.
This PR also fixes a bug in how a chainstate's `setBlockIndexCandidates` was being initialized; it should always have all the HAVE_DATA block index entries that have more work than the chain tip. During startup, we were not fully populating `setBlockIndexCandidates` in some scenarios involving multiple chainstates.
Further, this PR establishes a concept that whenever we have 2 chainstates, that we always know the snapshotted chain's base block and the base block's hash must be an element of our block index. Given that, we can establish a new invariant that the background validation chainstate only needs to consider blocks leading to that snapshotted block entry as potential candidates for its tip. As a followup I would imagine that when writing net_processing logic to download blocks for the background chainstate, that we would use this concept to only download blocks towards the snapshotted entry as well.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK a733dd7
jamesob:
reACK a733dd7 ([`jamesob/ackr/27746.5.sdaftuar.rework_validation_logic`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/27746.5.sdaftuar.rework_validation_logic))
Sjors:
Code review ACK a733dd7.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK a733dd7. Just suggested changes since the last review. There are various small things that could be followed up on, but I think this is ready for merge.
Tree-SHA512: 9ec17746f22b9c27082743ee581b8adceb2bd322fceafa507b428bdcc3ffb8b4c6601fc61cc7bb1161f890c3d38503e8b49474da7b5ab1b1f38bda7aa8668675
0 commit comments