Skip to content

Commit 13bd88f

Browse files
authored
Merge pull request bitcoin#1230 from dr-orlovsky/patch-9
BIP-341: explicitly allow softforks with future leaf versions
2 parents a3a397c + 592cb6f commit 13bd88f

File tree

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

bip-0341.mediawiki

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ The following rules only apply when such an output is being spent. Any other out
7878
** If ''t ≥ 0xFFFFFFFF FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFF FFFFFFFE BAAEDCE6 AF48A03B BFD25E8C D0364141'' (order of secp256k1), fail.
7979
** Let ''Q = P + int(t)G''.
8080
** If ''q &ne; x(Q)'' or ''c[0] & 1 &ne; y(Q) mod 2'', fail<ref>'''Why is it necessary to reveal a bit in a script path spend and check that it matches the parity of the Y coordinate of ''Q''?''' The parity of the Y coordinate is necessary to lift the X coordinate ''q'' to a unique point. While this is not strictly necessary for verifying the taproot commitment as described above, it is necessary to allow batch verification. Alternatively, ''Q'' could be forced to have an even Y coordinate, but that would require retrying with different internal public keys (or different messages) until ''Q'' has that property. There is no downside to adding the parity bit because otherwise the control block bit would be unused.</ref>.
81-
** Execute the script, according to the applicable script rules<ref>'''What are the applicable script rules in script path spends?''' [[bip-0342.mediawiki|BIP342]] specifies validity rules that apply for leaf version 0xc0, but future proposals can introduce rules for other leaf versions.</ref>, using the witness stack elements excluding the script ''s'', the control block ''c'', and the annex ''a'' if present, as initial stack.
81+
** Execute the script, according to the applicable script rules<ref>'''What are the applicable script rules in script path spends?''' [[bip-0342.mediawiki|BIP342]] specifies validity rules that apply for leaf version 0xc0, but future proposals can introduce rules for other leaf versions.</ref>, using the witness stack elements excluding the script ''s'', the control block ''c'', and the annex ''a'' if present, as initial stack. This implies that for the future leaf versions (non-''0xC0'') the execution must succeed.<ref>'''Why we need to success on future leaf version validation''' This is required to enable future leaf versions as soft forks</ref>.
8282
8383
''q'' is referred to as ''taproot output key'' and ''p'' as ''taproot internal key''.
8484

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)