|
| 1 | +<pre> |
| 2 | + BIP: ? |
| 3 | + Layer: Consensus (soft fork) |
| 4 | + Title: Generic anti-replay protection using Script |
| 5 | + Author: Luke Dashjr < [email protected]> |
| 6 | + Comments-Summary: No comments yet. |
| 7 | + Comments-URI: FIXME |
| 8 | + Status: Draft |
| 9 | + Type: Standards Track |
| 10 | + Created: 2017-01-26 |
| 11 | + License: BSD-2-Clause |
| 12 | +</pre> |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +==Abstract== |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +This BIP describes a new opcode (OP_CHECKBLOCKATHEIGHT) for the Bitcoin scripting system that allows construction of transactions which are valid only on specific blockchains. |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +==Copyright== |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +This BIP is licensed under the BSD 2-clause license. |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +==Specification== |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +OP_CHECKBLOCKATHEIGHT redefines the existing NOP5 opcode. |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +When executed, if any of the following conditions are true, the script interpreter will terminate with an error: |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +* the stack has fewer than 2 elements; or |
| 29 | +* the top item on the stack is not interpretable as a minimal-length CScriptNum; or |
| 30 | +* the top item on the stack, when interpreted as a block height (see below) is not within the range of allowed blocks; or |
| 31 | +* the second-to-top item on the stack, when interpreted as a block hash, has leading zeros; or |
| 32 | +* the second-to-top item on the stack does not match the block hash of the block specified by the top item on the stack interpreted as a height. |
| 33 | +
|
| 34 | +Otherwise, script execution will continue as if a NOP had been executed. |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +FIXME: some way to mask out parts of the block hash for gambling/deterministic-random applications? |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +===Block height interpretation and limits=== |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +The specified block height may be either a negative number to specify a relative height, or a positive number for an absolute height. |
| 41 | +A value of -1 refers to the block immediately preceding the block the transaction is mined it (but this is not a valid value, note). |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +The specified height must not be more recent than the previous 100 blocks (that is, the largest negative value allowed is -101), nor older than 262144 blocks prior (ie, the smallest negative value is -262144). |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +===Deployment=== |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +This BIP will be deployed by "version bits" BIP9 with the '''name''' TBD and using '''bit''' TBD. |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +For Bitcoin '''mainnet''', the BIP9 '''starttime''' will be TBD (Epoch timestamp TBD) and BIP9 '''timeout''' will be TBD (Epoch timestamp TBD). |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +For Bitcoin '''mainnet''', the BIP9 '''starttime''' will be TBD (Epoch timestamp TBD) and BIP9 '''timeout''' will be TBD (Epoch timestamp TBD). |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +==Motivation== |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +In the event of a permanent blockchain split, some mechanism is desired by which the UTXOs valid in either chain may be spent without the transaction being validly replayable on the other chain. |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | +Additionally, there are some cases in normal Bitcoin operation wherein a wallet may need to respend a payment, but must guarantee its respend cannot be mined in the same block as a previous payment which has been recently conflicted by a double-spend. |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +==Reference Implementation== |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +TODO |
0 commit comments