Merge pull request bitcoin#1028 from kallewoof/202010-signmsg2

BIP-322: minor clarification

Author: luke-jr

bip-0322.mediawiki

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ More importantly, it does not prove ownership nor access to any funds, even if t
 
 == Specification ==
 
-This BIP follows the specification of BIP-325 challenges and solutions (see Signet comparison below).
+This BIP follows the specification of BIP-325 challenges and solutions.
 
 Let there be two virtual transactions to_spend and to_sign.
 
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ When a proof of funds is being created, additional inputs should be included for
 
 Proofs of funds are the base64-encoding of the to_spend and to_sign transactions concatenated in standard network serialisation, and proofs without additional inputs or time locks (simple proofs) are the base64-encoding of the to_sign script witness.
 
-A validator must verify it is valid and meets the description of virtual transactions as specified above. See "Validation" below.
+A validator must verify the proof is valid and meets the description of virtual transactions as specified above. See "Validation" below.
 
 === Validation ===