test: remove combined onion/localhost eviction protection tests

as we are about the change the behavior sufficiently that when we
have multiple disadvantaged networks and a small number of peers
under test, the number of protected peers per network can be different.

Author: jonatack

src/test/net_peer_eviction_tests.cpp

@@ -154,78 +154,6 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(peer_protection_test)
         /* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 2, 7, 8, 9},
         /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 11},
         random_context));
-
-    // Combined test: expect 1/4 onion and 2 localhost peers to be protected
-    // from eviction, sorted by longest uptime.
-    BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
-        num_peers, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
-            c.nTimeConnected = c.id;
-            c.m_is_onion = (c.id == 0 || c.id == 5 || c.id == 10);
-            c.m_is_local = (c.id == 1 || c.id == 9 || c.id == 11);
-        },
-        /* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 2, 5, 9, 10},
-        /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 11},
-        random_context));
-
-    // Combined test: expect having only 1 onion to allow allocating the
-    // remaining 2 of the 1/4 to localhost peers, sorted by longest uptime.
-    BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
-        num_peers + 4, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
-            c.nTimeConnected = c.id;
-            c.m_is_onion = (c.id == 15);
-            c.m_is_local = (c.id > 6 && c.id < 11);
-        },
-        /* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 15},
-        /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {4, 5, 6, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14},
-        random_context));
-
-    // Combined test: expect 2 onions (< 1/4) to allow allocating the minimum 2
-    // localhost peers, sorted by longest uptime.
-    BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
-        num_peers, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
-            c.nTimeConnected = c.id;
-            c.m_is_onion = (c.id == 7 || c.id == 9);
-            c.m_is_local = (c.id == 6 || c.id == 11);
-        },
-        /* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 6, 7, 9, 11},
-        /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10},
-        random_context));
-
-    // Combined test: when > 1/4, expect max 1/4 onion and 2 localhost peers
-    // to be protected from eviction, sorted by longest uptime.
-    BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
-        num_peers, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
-            c.nTimeConnected = c.id;
-            c.m_is_onion = (c.id > 3 && c.id < 8);
-            c.m_is_local = (c.id > 7);
-        },
-        /* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9},
-        /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {1, 2, 3, 7, 10, 11},
-        random_context));
-
-    // Combined test: idem > 1/4 with only 8 peers: expect 2 onion and 2
-    // localhost peers (1/4 + 2) to be protected, sorted by longest uptime.
-    BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
-        8, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
-            c.nTimeConnected = c.id;
-            c.m_is_onion = (c.id > 1 && c.id < 5);
-            c.m_is_local = (c.id > 4);
-        },
-        /* protected_peer_ids */ {2, 3, 5, 6},
-        /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 4, 7},
-        random_context));
-
-    // Combined test: idem > 1/4 with only 6 peers: expect 1 onion peer and no
-    // localhost peers (1/4 + 0) to be protected, sorted by longest uptime.
-    BOOST_CHECK(IsProtected(
-        6, [](NodeEvictionCandidate& c) {
-            c.nTimeConnected = c.id;
-            c.m_is_onion = (c.id == 4 || c.id == 5);
-            c.m_is_local = (c.id == 3);
-        },
-        /* protected_peer_ids */ {0, 1, 4},
-        /* unprotected_peer_ids */ {2, 3, 5},
-        random_context));
 }
 
 // Returns true if any of the node ids in node_ids are selected for eviction.