You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Merge #21025: validation: Guard chainman chainstates with cs_main
20677ff validation: Guard all chainstates with cs_main (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
```
This avoids a potential race-condition where a thread is reading the
ChainstateManager::m_active_chainstate pointer while another one is
writing to it. There is no portable guarantee that reading/writing the
pointer is thread-safe.
This is also done in way that mimics ::ChainstateActive(), so the
transition from that function to this method is easy.
More discussion:
1. bitcoin/bitcoin#20749 (comment)
2. bitcoin/bitcoin#19806 (comment)
3. bitcoin/bitcoin#19806 (comment)
4. bitcoin/bitcoin#19806 (comment)
```
Basically this PR removes the loaded-but-unfired footgun, which:
- Is multiplied (but still unshot) in the chainman deglobalization PRs (#20158)
- Is shot in the test framework in the au.activate PR (#19806)
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
code review ACK 20677ff. I've verified by eye that neither of these members are accessed without cs_main.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 20677ff. It is safer to have these new `GUARDED_BY` annotations and locks than not to have them, but in the longer run I think every `LOCK(cs_main)` added here and added earlier in f92dc65 from #20749 should be removed and replaced with `EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main)` on the accessor methods instead. `cs_main` is a high level lock that should be explicitly acquired at a high level to prevent the chain state from changing. It shouldn't be acquired recursively in low-level methods just to read pointer values atomically.
Tree-SHA512: 68a3a46d79a407b774eab77e1d682a97e95f1672db0a5fcb877572e188bec09f3a7b47c5d0cc1f2769ea276896dcbe97cb35c861acf7d8e3e513e955dc773f89
0 commit comments