From b72b7270cd1d93177d166f57de24df34e3bc15e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: leopardracer <136604165+leopardracer@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 10:56:32 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Update psbt.spec.ts

---
 test/psbt.spec.ts | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/test/psbt.spec.ts b/test/psbt.spec.ts
index 410c3ed7d..232279b4f 100644
--- a/test/psbt.spec.ts
+++ b/test/psbt.spec.ts
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ describe(`Psbt`, () => {
 
         psbts[0].combine(psbts[1]);
 
-        // Produces a different Base64 string due to implemetation specific key-value ordering.
+        // Produces a different Base64 string due to implementation specific key-value ordering.
         // That means this test will fail:
         // assert.strictEqual(psbts[0].toBase64(), f.result)
         // However, if we compare the actual PSBT properties we can see they are logically identical:

From f89fafb09c39e5786460ca26501771ea2b669bbd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: leopardracer <136604165+leopardracer@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 10:59:29 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Update taproot.spec.ts

---
 test/integration/taproot.spec.ts | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/test/integration/taproot.spec.ts b/test/integration/taproot.spec.ts
index ec8e4071e..7f9821a88 100644
--- a/test/integration/taproot.spec.ts
+++ b/test/integration/taproot.spec.ts
@@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ describe('bitcoinjs-lib (transaction with taproot)', () => {
     } catch (err) {
       if ((err as any).message !== 'non-BIP68-final')
         throw new Error(
-          'Expected OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY validation to fail. But it faild with: ' +
+          'Expected OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY validation to fail. But it failed with: ' +
             err,
         );
     }