provide a net9 build target #2219
bitfaster
This run and associated checks have been archived and are scheduled for deletion.
Learn more about checks retention
Annotations
12 warnings
|
Analyze (csharp)
The following actions use a deprecated Node.js version and will be forced to run on node20: actions/checkout@v3, github/codeql-action/init@v2, actions/[email protected], github/codeql-action/analyze@v2. For more info: https://github.blog/changelog/2024-03-07-github-actions-all-actions-will-run-on-node20-instead-of-node16-by-default/
|
|
Analyze (csharp)
CodeQL Action v2 will be deprecated on December 5th, 2024. Please update all occurrences of the CodeQL Action in your workflow files to v3. For more information, see https://github.blog/changelog/2024-01-12-code-scanning-deprecation-of-codeql-action-v2/
|
|
Analyze (csharp):
BitFaster.Caching/Lru/ConcurrentLruCore.cs#L894
Type parameter 'K' has the same name as the type parameter from outer type 'ConcurrentLruCore<K, V, I, P, T>'
|
|
Analyze (csharp):
BitFaster.Caching/Lru/ConcurrentLruCore.cs#L894
Type parameter 'V' has the same name as the type parameter from outer type 'ConcurrentLruCore<K, V, I, P, T>'
|
|
Analyze (csharp):
BitFaster.Caching/Lru/ConcurrentLruCore.cs#L870
Missing XML comment for publicly visible type or member 'ConcurrentLruCore<K, V, I, P, T>.GetAlternateCache<TAlternateKey>()'
|
|
Analyze (csharp):
BitFaster.Caching/Lru/ConcurrentLruCore.cs#L880
Missing XML comment for publicly visible type or member 'ConcurrentLruCore<K, V, I, P, T>.TryGetAlternateCache<TAlternateKey>(out ConcurrentLruCore<K, V, I, P, T>.IAlternateCache<TAlternateKey, K, V>)'
|
|
Analyze (csharp):
BitFaster.Caching/Lru/ConcurrentLruCore.cs#L894
Missing XML comment for publicly visible type or member 'ConcurrentLruCore<K, V, I, P, T>.IAlternateCache<TAlternateKey, K, V>'
|
|
Analyze (csharp):
BitFaster.Caching/Lru/ConcurrentLruCore.cs#L896
Missing XML comment for publicly visible type or member 'ConcurrentLruCore<K, V, I, P, T>.IAlternateCache<TAlternateKey, K, V>.TryGet(TAlternateKey, out V)'
|
|
Analyze (csharp):
BitFaster.Caching/Lru/ConcurrentLruCore.cs#L898
Missing XML comment for publicly visible type or member 'ConcurrentLruCore<K, V, I, P, T>.IAlternateCache<TAlternateKey, K, V>.TryRemove(TAlternateKey, out K, out V)'
|
|
Analyze (csharp):
BitFaster.Caching/Lru/ConcurrentLruCore.cs#L900
Missing XML comment for publicly visible type or member 'ConcurrentLruCore<K, V, I, P, T>.IAlternateCache<TAlternateKey, K, V>.GetOrAdd(TAlternateKey, Func<TAlternateKey, V>)'
|
|
Analyze (csharp):
BitFaster.Caching/Lru/ConcurrentLruCore.cs#L902
Missing XML comment for publicly visible type or member 'ConcurrentLruCore<K, V, I, P, T>.IAlternateCache<TAlternateKey, K, V>.GetOrAdd<TArg>(TAlternateKey, Func<TAlternateKey, TArg, V>, TArg)'
|
|
Analyze (csharp):
BitFaster.Caching/Atomic/AtomicEx.cs#L28
Possible multiple enumerations of 'IEnumerable' collection. Consider using an implementation that avoids multiple enumerations. (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1851)
|