Skip to content

Don't redefine terminology #45

@WhyNotHugo

Description

@WhyNotHugo

The Terminology section defines a few terms which are already defined in RFC8030 (the specification for HTTP Web Push): https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8030#section-1.1

For example, RFC8030 reads:

push message: A message sent from an application server to a user
agent via a push service.

And the current draft defines the same concept in other words:

Push message Actual network message that is sent from the server
over a push transport to the client. Notifies the client that a
specific collection (identified by its push topic) has changed.

Instead, the draft should re-use existing terminology:

This specification reuses much of the same terminology as RFC8030

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

Status

Done

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions