Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Whenever you do a So what kind of output would you expect from the double grouping in this case? A simple double grouping which seems to work:
This first groups by the section subpath, and then on the first character of that key. Is it usefult? Maybe not, but it does show a double grouping. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I have this query:
Which gives me a very good estimate of what I'm looking for.
I'd like to now also
GROUP BY path
(or, hopefully, its auto-linking counterpart).Separately, both work. However, together I either get:
**-** (3)
as the first group, forAny ideas? Any clarification I missed from the docs?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions