fix: use more efficient range over SplitSeq (#459)

wolf31o2 · web-flow · commit 764475e08205 · 2025-08-01T11:52:08.000-04:00
Signed-off-by: Chris Gianelloni &lt;wolf31o2@blinklabs.io&gt;
diff --git a/input/chainsync/plugin.go b/input/chainsync/plugin.go
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ func NewFromCmdlineOptions() plugin.Plugin {
 	}
 	if cmdlineOptions.intersectPoint != "" {
 		intersectPoints := []ocommon.Point{}
-		for _, point := range strings.Split(cmdlineOptions.intersectPoint, ",") {
+		for point := range strings.SplitSeq(cmdlineOptions.intersectPoint, ",") {
 			intersectPointParts := strings.Split(point, ".")
 			if len(intersectPointParts) != 2 {
 				panic("invalid intersect point format")

Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ func NewFromCmdlineOptions() plugin.Plugin {`
`154`	`154`	`}`
`155`	`155`	`if cmdlineOptions.intersectPoint != "" {`
`156`	`156`	`intersectPoints := []ocommon.Point{}`
`157`		`- for _, point := range strings.Split(cmdlineOptions.intersectPoint, ",") {`
	`157`	`+ for point := range strings.SplitSeq(cmdlineOptions.intersectPoint, ",") {`
`158`	`158`	`intersectPointParts := strings.Split(point, ".")`
`159`	`159`	`if len(intersectPointParts) != 2 {`
`160`	`160`	`panic("invalid intersect point format")`