Skip to content

chore: disable CodeRabbit review status comments#1069

Merged
muratkeremozcan merged 1 commit intobmad-code-org:mainfrom
alexeyv:chore/silence-coderabbit-status
Dec 9, 2025
Merged

chore: disable CodeRabbit review status comments#1069
muratkeremozcan merged 1 commit intobmad-code-org:mainfrom
alexeyv:chore/silence-coderabbit-status

Conversation

@alexeyv
Copy link
Collaborator

@alexeyv alexeyv commented Dec 8, 2025

Summary

  • Disable the useless automatic "Review skipped" comments on PRs
  • CodeRabbit remains available on-demand via @coderabbitai review
  • Until someone invokes CodeRabbit with a @coderabbit review comment, it shouldn't appear in the comments on a PR

Test plan

  • Verified chat.auto_reply: true still enables on-demand reviews
  • Confirm no "Review skipped" comment appears on this PR

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Disabled automatic code review trigger in configuration.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Suppress the automatic "Review skipped" comments on PRs.
CodeRabbit can still be invoked on-demand with @coderabbitai review.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@alexeyv alexeyv self-assigned this Dec 8, 2025
@alexeyv alexeyv requested a review from bmadcode December 8, 2025 21:06
@alexeyv
Copy link
Collaborator Author

alexeyv commented Dec 8, 2025

@CodeRabbit review

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 8, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 8, 2025

Walkthrough

The .coderabbit.yaml configuration file has been modified to disable the automatic review trigger by changing the review_status setting from true to false. No other configuration fields or behaviors are affected.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Configuration
\.coderabbit\.yaml
review_status setting changed from true to false

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: disabling CodeRabbit's automatic review status comments in .coderabbit.yaml by changing review_status from true to false.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cf50f49 and d55f518.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.coderabbit.yaml (1)

9-9: Configuration correctly disables automatic review status comments.

Setting review_status: false prevents CodeRabbit from posting review details on each review and posting a review status when a review is skipped. Combined with auto_review.enabled: false (line 13) and chat.auto_reply: true (line 35), this achieves the PR objective: automatic reviews are disabled, but on-demand reviews via @coderabbitai review remain functional.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@pbean pbean left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved

@muratkeremozcan muratkeremozcan merged commit 5971a88 into bmad-code-org:main Dec 9, 2025
29 checks passed
@alexeyv alexeyv deleted the chore/silence-coderabbit-status branch December 13, 2025 18:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants