@@ -23,8 +23,7 @@ interested in learning more about small implementation details.
23
23
24
24
Currently, ` temporal_rs ` v0.1 is being used by Boa, [ Kiesel] [ kiesel-site ] ,
25
25
[ V8] [ v8-site ] , and [ Yavashark] [ yavashark-repo ] for their Temporal
26
- implementations (more on that later) and will soon being
27
- [ shipping in Chrome] ( https://chromestatus.com/feature/5668291307634688 ) .
26
+ implementations (more on that later) and is [ estimated] ( https://chromestatus.com/feature/5668291307634688 ) to land unflagged in Chromium v143.
28
27
29
28
### Why v0.1? Why not v1.0?
30
29
@@ -50,18 +49,18 @@ culminated in an absolutely massive PR,
50
49
[ #3277 ] ( https://github.com/boa-dev/boa/pull/3277 ) (ASIDE from nekevss:
51
50
mea culpa).
52
51
53
- > _ Temporal is the single biggest addition to ECMAScript since ES6 _
52
+ > _ "Temporal is the single biggest addition to ECMAScript since ES6" _
54
53
55
54
The PR itself stubbed out a lot of the methods, implemented some
56
55
Duration and Instant functionality, and started the support for custom
57
- calendars. There were, however, 2 major take aways from this PR, first :
58
- - Temporal is a massive specification update, it's the single biggest addition to ECMAScript since ES6; and second. .
59
- - there is a lot of room to potentially optimize Temporal if we do not deal with
56
+ calendars. There were, however, 2 major take aways from this PR:
57
+ - Temporal is a massive specification update, it's the single biggest addition to ECMAScript since ES6.
58
+ - There is a lot of room to potentially optimize Temporal if we do not deal with
60
59
` JsValue ` directly.
61
60
62
- After a couple weeks, the question came up amongst maintainers of not just Boa, but other engines :
63
- could we separate the datetime logic and implementation off into a completely
64
- separate library? Sure, why not .
61
+ After a couple weeks, the question came up amongst maintainers of not just Boa, but also V8 :
62
+ " _ could we separate the datetime logic and implementation off into a completely
63
+ separate library?_ " Sure.
65
64
66
65
The first commit of then ` boa_temporal ` occurred in PR
67
66
[ #3461 ] ( https://github.com/boa-dev/boa/pull/3461 ) , which moved the
0 commit comments