Dedup sepolicy handling #1322
Merged
Dedup sepolicy handling #1322
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
For historical reasons the ostree sepolicy API can exist as a no-op even if it didn't find a policy, one has to query `.csum()` or `.name()` to verify it's present. In our code just map that case to None. Followup to 99d30df to ensure we consistently handle this case. Signed-off-by: Colin Walters <[email protected]>
ckyrouac
approved these changes
May 15, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For historical reasons the ostree sepolicy API can exist as a no-op even if it didn't find a policy, one has to query
.csum()or.name()to verify it's present.In our code just map that case to None.
Followup to 99d30df to ensure we consistently handle this case.