|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +title: Top Open-Source Postgres Auth Solutions in 2025 |
| 3 | +author: Adela |
| 4 | +updated_at: 2025/09/22 09:15:26 |
| 5 | +feature_image: /content/blog/top-open-source-postgres-auth-solution/cover.webp |
| 6 | +tags: Industry |
| 7 | +description: Top open-source Postgres authentication solutions for 2025. |
| 8 | +--- |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +**Postgres has become the go-to database for modern apps. But authentication (who a user is) and authorization (what they can do) are just as critical.** |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +In 2025, you have plenty of open-source options. To make it simple, here are the most relevant solutions, grouped by type, with clear "best for" recommendations. |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +## 1. Platforms (Postgres + Auth bundled) |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +These give you Postgres, authentication, and APIs in one package. Ideal if you want **RLS (Row Level Security) to work out of the box**. |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +### 🔹 [Supabase Auth](https://supabase.com/docs/guides/auth) |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +- **Features:** Email/password, magic links, OAuth, phone, Web3 logins. |
| 23 | +- **Integration:** Deep RLS support (`auth.uid()`, `auth.jwt()` directly usable in policies). |
| 24 | +- **Third-party support:** Can trust IdPs like Clerk, Firebase Auth, Cognito, WorkOS, etc. but only if they issue **asymmetric JWTs**. Key rotation can lag \~30 min. Supabase Auth itself can’t be disabled. |
| 25 | +- **Best for:** Startups and teams that want the **fastest path** to secure Postgres apps. |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +### 🔹 [Nhost](https://nhost.io/product/auth) (Hasura-based) |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +- **Features:** Postgres + Hasura GraphQL API + Auth. |
| 32 | +- **Integration:** Auth ties into Hasura permissions, which map back to Postgres RLS. |
| 33 | +- **Best for:** Teams building **GraphQL-first apps** who want a fully open-source stack. |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +## 2. Libraries (you own the server) |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +These plug into your backend, store users in Postgres, and issue JWTs. You stay in control. |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +### 🔹 [Auth.js](https://authjs.dev/) |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +- **Features:** 50+ OAuth providers, session handling, JWT support. |
| 44 | +- **Integration:** Postgres adapter for users and sessions. |
| 45 | +- **Best for:** Apps with custom backends, especially **Next.js** or full-stack JS. |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +### 🔹 [Better Auth](https://better-auth.com/) |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +- **Features:** TypeScript-first, supports multi-tenancy, 2FA, org management. |
| 52 | +- **Integration:** Native Postgres support with Kysely/Drizzle + schema migration tooling. |
| 53 | +- **Best for:** **TypeScript-heavy teams** who want modern DX and self-hosted control. |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +### 🔹 [Lucia](https://lucia-auth.com/) (maintenance mode) |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +- **Features:** Educational focus, lightweight packages. |
| 60 | +- **Status:** v3 is deprecated, supported only until March 2025. |
| 61 | +- **Best for:** Existing projects. Not recommended for new ones. |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | +## 3. Identity Servers (standalone IdP) |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | +These are separate services that act as the **source of truth for identity**. They issue JWTs for your apps. |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | +### 🔹 [Ory Kratos](https://www.ory.sh/kratos/) |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | +- **Features:** Registration, recovery, passwordless login, customizable flows. |
| 70 | +- **Integration:** Uses Postgres as identity store; issues JWTs consumed by RLS. |
| 71 | +- **Best for:** Centralized identity across multiple services. |
| 72 | + |
| 73 | +### 🔹 [Keycloak](https://www.keycloak.org/) |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +- **Features:** Enterprise-grade IdP with OIDC, SAML, LDAP, and multi-realm/org support. |
| 76 | +- **Integration:** Runs on Postgres and issues JWTs for your apps. |
| 77 | +- **Best for:** Large orgs needing **enterprise SSO** and federation features. |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | +### 🔹 [ZITADEL](https://zitadel.com/) |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | +- **Features:** Modern IdP with org/project/role management. |
| 82 | +- **Integration:** Postgres/Cockroach backend; OIDC → Postgres RLS. |
| 83 | +- **Best for:** Cloud-native teams who want a modern, OSS alternative to commercial IdPs. |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | +## 4. Other OSS Options |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | +### 🔹 [SuperTokens](https://supertokens.com/) |
| 88 | + |
| 89 | +- **Features:** Recipes for email/password, social login, passwordless, session management. |
| 90 | +- **Integration:** Native Postgres support; cloud or self-host. |
| 91 | +- **Best for:** Developers who want **prebuilt flows** but remain OSS-first. |
| 92 | + |
| 93 | +## 5. [Postgres-Native Pattern](/blog/postgres-native-pattern/) (minimalist) |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | +You can also skip heavy auth systems: |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | +- Issue JWTs (from a small service or IdP). |
| 98 | +- Validate them at the API edge (PostgREST, Supabase, or a proxy). |
| 99 | +- Let **RLS** enforce access inside Postgres. |
| 100 | + |
| 101 | +**Best for:** Small-to-mid apps where you want **maximum simplicity** and DB-driven auth. |
| 102 | + |
| 103 | + |
| 104 | +## Comparison Table |
| 105 | + |
| 106 | +| Solution | Type | Hosting | Postgres Integration | Learning Curve | Best for | |
| 107 | +| --------------------------- | -------------------- | ----------------- | -------------------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------- | |
| 108 | +| Supabase Auth | Platform (BaaS) | Cloud / Self-host | Native (RLS, JWT helpers) | Low | Startups, all-in-one apps | |
| 109 | +| Nhost | Platform (GraphQL) | Cloud / Self-host | Hasura + RLS | Medium | GraphQL-first teams | |
| 110 | +| Auth.js | Library | Self-host | Postgres adapter | Medium | Flexible, multi-provider apps | |
| 111 | +| Better Auth | Library | Self-host | Native schema + migrations | Medium | TypeScript-first projects | |
| 112 | +| Lucia (v3) | Library (deprecated) | Self-host | Postgres adapter | High | Legacy projects only | |
| 113 | +| Ory Kratos | Identity server | Self-host | Postgres identity store | High | Multi-app identity | |
| 114 | +| Keycloak | Identity server | Self-host | Native Postgres | High | Enterprise SSO | |
| 115 | +| ZITADEL | Identity server | Self-host / Cloud | Postgres/Cockroach backend | Medium | Cloud-native IdP | |
| 116 | +| SuperTokens | Library / Service | Cloud / Self-host | Native Postgres | Medium | Prebuilt flows | |
| 117 | +| Postgres-native (JWT → RLS) | Pattern | Self-host | Direct via RLS claims | Low | Minimalist DB-driven | |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | +## Conclusion |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | +- **Fastest startup path** → **Supabase Auth** |
| 122 | +- **GraphQL-first stack** → **Nhost** |
| 123 | +- **Custom backend** → **Auth.js** or **Better Auth** |
| 124 | +- **Enterprise / multi-app identity** → **Keycloak, Ory Kratos, ZITADEL** |
| 125 | +- **Minimalist & DB-driven** → Postgres-native JWT → RLS |
| 126 | +- **Prebuilt recipes** → **SuperTokens** |
| 127 | + |
| 128 | +No matter which tool you pick, the principle is the same: **JWT claims flow into Postgres RLS**, making the database itself the final gatekeeper. |
0 commit comments