|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +title: "GitHub vs. GitLab: a Complete Comparison in 2025" |
| 3 | +author: Tianzhou |
| 4 | +updated_at: 2024/12/25 12:00 |
| 5 | +feature_image: /content/blog/github-vs-gitlab/cover.webp |
| 6 | +tags: Industry |
| 7 | +featured: true |
| 8 | +description: 'An extensive comparison between GitHub and GitLab on history, code hosting, code review, |
| 9 | +code search, ci/cd, security, project management, ai, open ' |
| 10 | +--- |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +<HintBlock type="info"> |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +This post is updated regularly. For the impatience, jump to the [last section](#github-or-gitlab) to |
| 15 | +see the comparison table. The [References](#references) provides further readings. |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +</HintBlock> |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +Unless you are an Atlassian fanatic, your choice for source code management (SCM) will likely come |
| 20 | +down to GitHub or GitLab. At Bytebase, we’ve extensively used both to develop our [database-as-code](/docs/vcs-integration/overview/) |
| 21 | +solutions. Drawing from our hands-on experience, we provide a detailed comparison of GitHub and GitLab |
| 22 | +across the following key areas. |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +- [History](#history) |
| 25 | +- [Deployment Model](#deployment-model) |
| 26 | +- [Tech Stack](#tech-stack) |
| 27 | +- [Repository Management](#repository-management) |
| 28 | +- [Code Review](#code-review) |
| 29 | +- [Code Search](#code-search) |
| 30 | +- [CI/CD](#cicd) |
| 31 | +- [Security](#security) |
| 32 | +- [Project Management](#project-management) |
| 33 | +- [AI](#ai) |
| 34 | +- [Open Source](#open-source) |
| 35 | +- [Ecosystem](#ecosystem) |
| 36 | +- [Pricing](#pricing) |
| 37 | +- [Switching Cost](#switching-cost) |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +## History |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +**GitHub** was launched in [April 2008](https://github.blog/news-insights/the-library/we-launched/). GitHub |
| 44 | +quickly gained traction among developers, becoming a hub for open-source projects. In 2018, Microsoft |
| 45 | +[acquired](https://news.microsoft.com/2018/06/04/microsoft-to-acquire-github-for-7-5-billion/) GitHub for $7.5 billion. |
| 46 | +In 2021, GitHub [introduced Copilot](https://github.blog/news-insights/product-news/introducing-github-copilot-ai-pair-programmer/), |
| 47 | +revolutionizing how developers write code. Today, GitHub is the world's largest code collaboration platform, |
| 48 | +empowering millions of developers and organizations globally. |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +--- |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +**GitLab** was launched in October 2011 as an open-source project, aiming |
| 55 | +to provide a self-hosted alternative to existing Git repository management solutions. |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +During the [YC 2015 pitch](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmrDjvv_ENQ&t=141s), GitLab positioned itself as an |
| 60 | +open-source GitHub alternative. In 2021, GitLab goes public on the NASDAQ under the ticker `GTLB`. Over time, |
| 61 | +GitLab evolved from a DevOps platform to a comprehensive DevSecOps solution, integrating security into the software development lifecycle (SDLC). |
| 62 | +In May 2023, GitLab [introduced AI-powered features](https://about.gitlab.com/press/releases/2023-05-22-gitlab-16-announces-ai-powered-devsecops-platform/) |
| 63 | +with the release of GitLab 16, followed by the beta release of GitLab Duo Chat in November 2023. |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | +## Deployment Model |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | +GitHub began as a SaaS platform and later introduced self-hosted options through GitHub Enterprise. |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | +GitLab started as a self-hosted solution and subsequently offered a SaaS option. |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | +Despite both platforms offering SaaS and self-hosted options, there's a perception that GitHub is primarily SaaS-focused, while GitLab is more associated with self-hosting. GitHub has enhanced its self-hosted offerings with features like CodeQL. |
| 72 | + |
| 73 | +<HintBlock type="info"> |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +You can self-host GitLab Community Edition for free, whereas self-hosting GitHub requires the Enterprise version. |
| 76 | + |
| 77 | +</HintBlock> |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | +## Tech Stack |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | +GitHub primarily uses Ruby on Rails for its core application, with MySQL serving as its main database. |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | +GitLab also relies on Ruby on Rails but uses PostgreSQL as its core database. In 2018, GitLab introduced `Gitaly`, |
| 84 | +a Git RPC service written in Go. For more details on GitLab’s tech stack, refer to the [installation requirements](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/install/requirements.html). |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +## Repository Management |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | +The core feature sets are comparable. However, GitHub leads the way in code collaboration, pioneering lightweight forks and pull requests (PRs). |
| 89 | + |
| 90 | +GitLab later introduced merge requests (MRs), its equivalent to GitHub's PRs, along with fork functionality. |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | +## Code Review |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +## Code Search |
| 95 | + |
| 96 | +## CI/CD |
| 97 | + |
| 98 | +## Security |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | +## Project Management |
| 101 | + |
| 102 | +## AI |
| 103 | + |
| 104 | +## Open Source |
| 105 | + |
| 106 | +## Ecosystem |
| 107 | + |
| 108 | +## Installation |
| 109 | + |
| 110 | +GitHub uses MySQL |
| 111 | +GitLab uses PostgreSQL |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | +## Pricing |
| 114 | + |
| 115 | +## Switching Cost |
| 116 | + |
| 117 | +## GitHub or GitLab |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | +## Trajectory |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | +## References |
| 122 | + |
| 123 | +- [A Brief History of the Pull Request](https://rdnlsmith.com/posts/2023/004/pull-request-origins/) |
| 124 | +- [History of GitLab](https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/company/history/) |
| 125 | +- [The road to Gitaly v1.0](https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2018/09/12/the-road-to-gitaly-1-0/) |
0 commit comments