Replies: 2 comments
-
Go for it |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Feel free to combine! I'm currently using loader in my work with cargo component, but as long as things mostly work the same, I can easily adapt |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
As I've been looking at unified publishing (#13) it has become clear to me that my plan to have separate
wasm-pkg-loader
andwasm-pkg-publisher
crates is arbitrary and unhelpful; the two crates would have ended up with nearly identical dependencies and large amounts of code overlap. If there end up being scenarios where a downstream consumer wants to avoid some code associated exclusively with publishing then we can feature flag it out instead.Given that, I'm planning to rename
wasm-pkg-loader
towasm-pkg-client
as part of the publishing implementation. I'd like to just drop thewasm-pkg-loader
crate entirely but if that is going to cause pain for someone already depending on it please comment here and we can look at a more gradual migration.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions