Skip to content

WebVoyager Benchmark Evaluation Method: Text-only or Multimodal? #221

@jimodeniuren

Description

@jimodeniuren

Thank you for your excellent work on the UI-tars model! I have a couple of questions regarding the evaluation setup for the WebVoyager benchmark mentioned in your paper/repository.

Question 1: Evaluation Modality
When evaluating UI-tars on the WebVoyager benchmark, did you use a text-only evaluation approach or a multimodal evaluation method? Specifically, I'd like to understand whether the model processes screenshots/visual information or relies solely on textual representations (e.g., HTML, accessibility trees) during the evaluation.

Question 2: Evaluation Prompts
Could you share the exact prompts you used during the WebVoyager benchmark evaluation? Understanding the prompt template would help me better reproduce your results and compare with other approaches.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions