Typescript usage #79
-
|
Regarding typescript usage, has anyone tried it? Should I use https://github.com/justjake/quickjs-emscripten Or what do you recommend? I prefer typescript to regular JS as I do most things in Typescript, but I don't know if it will pose some problems here or if there are any limitations @c-smile . Thanks in advance for the insight, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
|
Typescript is just a preprocessor that compiles .ts files to .js files. So it has nothing with Sciter per se - you will load those .js files in Sciter as usual. If you want standalone compiler then check :
( link taken from https://bellard.org/quickjs/ ) In principle that compiler should work in Sciter "as it is" so you can load .ts files in Sciter directly. If that makes sense of course. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yes, I knew that it is a preprocessor... I was asking more about compatibility issues between those bindings and the embedded version of quick-js interpreter. So I deduce that the embeded version of quick-js is always the official one? And yes, that would be nice, of course, loading TS files directly. Although the link that you sent seems to be for linux only and there is no windows alternative, it seems. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yes, superset of official QuickJS
It contains .ts compiler sources + patch of .ts compiler to work inside Quick.JS |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Typescript is just a preprocessor that compiles .ts files to .js files. So it has nothing with Sciter per se - you will load those .js files in Sciter as usual.
If you want standalone compiler then check :
( link taken from https://bellard.org/quickjs/ )
In principle that compiler should work in Sciter "as it is" so you can load .ts files in Sciter directly. If that makes sense of course.