|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +title: Feature Group for In-place Upgrades support in Cluster API |
| 3 | +authors: |
| 4 | + - "@g-gaston" |
| 5 | +reviewers: |
| 6 | + - "@dharmjit" |
| 7 | + - "@vincepri" |
| 8 | + - "@sbueringer" |
| 9 | + - "@fabriziopandini" |
| 10 | +creation-date: 2023-10-16 |
| 11 | +last-updated: 2023-10-16 |
| 12 | +status: proposed |
| 13 | +see-also: |
| 14 | + - https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api/issues/9489 |
| 15 | + - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CqQ1SAqJD264PsDeMj_Z3HhZxe7DViNkpJ9d5q-2Zck |
| 16 | +--- |
| 17 | +# In-place upgrades Feature Group |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +This document briefly outlines the scope, communication media, and stakeholders for a formal Feature Group dedicated to defining a Cluster API-approved solution to upgrade the kubernetes components running in CAPI managed nodes without replacing those machines. |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +## User Story and Problem Statement |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +As a CAPI Kubernetes cluster admin I want to upgrade the k8s components (for example, a minor Kubernetes upgrade) of my cluster without replacing the machines. |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +At present, CAPI has "immutable infrastructure" as one of its axioms: once created, Machines are not updated, they are just replaced (a new one is created and old one is deleted). As a consequence, the only supported upgrade strategy is rolling update. However, for certain use cases (such as Single-Node Clusters with no spare capacity, Multi-Node Clusters with VM/OS customizations for high-performance/low-latency workloads or dependency on local persistent storage), upgrading a cluster via RollingUpdate strategy could either be not feasible or a costly operation (requiring to re-apply customizations on newer nodes and hence more downtime). |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +## Scope |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +The scope of this effort will be the following: |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +1. Define the scope of what In-place upgrades means in the context of Cluster API. |
| 32 | +2. Write a CAPI proposal with the recommended solution. |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +## Communication |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +We will meet on [Wednesdays at 08:00 PT (Pacific Time)][zoomMeeting]. [Convert to your timezone](https://dateful.com/time-zone-converter?t=09:00&tz=PT%20%28Pacific%20Time%29). Meeting notes will be documented in this [Google Doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GmRd6MyQ0mWAoJV6rCHhZTSTtKMKHdJzhXm0BLBXOnw). |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +Regular, summarized updates of group progress will be provided during weekly Cluster API office hours on Wednesdays @ 10:00 PT on [Zoom][zoomMeeting]. |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +Chat with stakeholders on Kubernetes [Slack](http://slack.k8s.io/) in the [cluster-api](https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/C8TSNPY4T) channel. |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +## Stakeholders |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +Primary Stakeholders are listed below: |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +- Mayur Das (@mayur-tolexo, VMware) |
| 47 | +- Alexander Demicev (@alexander-demicev, SUSE) |
| 48 | +- Scott Dodson (@sdodson, Red Hat) |
| 49 | +- Guillermo Gaston (@g-gaston, AWS) |
| 50 | +- Furkat Gofurov (@furkatgofurov7, SUSE) |
| 51 | +- Dharmjit Singh (@dharmjit, VMware) |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +[zoomMeeting]: https://zoom.us/j/861487554 |
0 commit comments