|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +synopsis: > |
| 3 | + Learn how to define and manage status-transition flows in your CDS models using annotations, without writing custom handlers. |
| 4 | +#status: released |
| 5 | +--- |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +# Status-Transition Flows <Beta /> |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +[...] |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +## Extending Flows |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +[...] |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +### Example Use Case |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +Consider a requirement where customers can withdraw from travel — for example, due to sickness — but only up to 24 hours before travel begins. This requires custom validation logic. |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +The status transition diagram below shows the new state and transitions: |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +First, add the `Withdrawn` status and the `withdrawTravel` action to the model: |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +```cds |
| 25 | +// db/schema.cds |
| 26 | +entity TravelStatus : sap.common.CodeList { |
| 27 | + key code : String(1) enum { |
| 28 | + Open = 'O'; |
| 29 | + Accepted = 'A'; |
| 30 | + Canceled = 'X'; |
| 31 | + Withdrawn = 'W'; // [!code highlight] |
| 32 | + } |
| 33 | +} |
| 34 | +
|
| 35 | +// srv/travel-service.cds |
| 36 | +service TravelService { |
| 37 | +
|
| 38 | + // Define entity and actions |
| 39 | + entity Travels as projection on db.Travels |
| 40 | + actions { |
| 41 | + action rejectTravel(); |
| 42 | + action acceptTravel(); |
| 43 | + action withdrawTravel(); // [!code highlight] |
| 44 | + action deductDiscount( percent: Percentage not null ) returns Travels; |
| 45 | + }; |
| 46 | +
|
| 47 | + // Define flow through actions |
| 48 | + annotate Travels with @flow.status: Status actions { |
| 49 | + rejectTravel @from: #Open @to: #Canceled; |
| 50 | + acceptTravel @from: #Open @to: #Accepted; |
| 51 | + withdrawTravel @from: [#Open, #Accepted]; // [!code highlight] |
| 52 | + deductDiscount @from: #Open; |
| 53 | + }; |
| 54 | +
|
| 55 | +} |
| 56 | +``` |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +Note that `withdrawTravel` has no `@to` annotation; you implement the transition in a custom handler. |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +### In Java |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | +Here is a custom Java implementation that enforces the 24-hour rule: |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | +```java |
| 66 | +@Component |
| 67 | +@ServiceName(TravelService_.CDS_NAME) |
| 68 | +public class WithdrawTravelHandler implements EventHandler { |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | + private final PersistenceService persistenceService; |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | + public WithdrawTravelHandler(PersistenceService persistenceService) { |
| 73 | + this.persistenceService = persistenceService; |
| 74 | + } |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | + @Before(entity = Travel_.CDS_NAME) |
| 77 | + public void check24HoursBeforeTravel(final TravelWithdrawTravelContext context, CqnStructuredTypeRef travelRef) { |
| 78 | + Travel travel = ((ApplicationService) context.getService()).run( |
| 79 | + Select.from(travelRef).columns(Travel_.BEGIN_DATE)).first(Travel.class) |
| 80 | + .orElseThrow(() -> new ServiceException(ErrorStatuses.BAD_REQUEST, "TRAVEL_NOT_FOUND")); |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | + if (travel.beginDate().isBefore(LocalDate.now().minusDays(1))) { |
| 83 | + context.getMessages().error("Travel can only be withdrawn up to 24 hours before travel begins."); |
| 84 | + } |
| 85 | + } |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | + @On(entity = Travel_.CDS_NAME) |
| 88 | + public void onWithdrawTravel(final TravelWithdrawTravelContext context, CqnStructuredTypeRef travelRef) { |
| 89 | + boolean isDraftTarget =DraftUtils.isDraftTarget( |
| 90 | + travelRef, |
| 91 | + context.getModel().findEntity(travelRef.targetSegment().id()).get(), |
| 92 | + context.getModel()); |
| 93 | + boolean isDraftEnabled = DraftUtils.isDraftEnabled(context.getTarget()); |
| 94 | + var travel = Travel.create(); |
| 95 | + travel.travelStatusCode(TravelStatusCode.WITHDRAWN); |
| 96 | + if (isDraftTarget) { |
| 97 | + ((DraftService) context.getService()).patchDraft(Update.entity(travelRef).data(travel)); |
| 98 | + } else { |
| 99 | + AnalysisResult analysis = CqnAnalyzer.create(context.getModel()).analyze(travelRef); |
| 100 | + Map<String, Object> keys = analysis.targetKeyValues(); |
| 101 | + if (isDraftEnabled) { |
| 102 | + keys.remove(Drafts.IS_ACTIVE_ENTITY); |
| 103 | + } |
| 104 | + persistenceService.run(Update.entity(context.getTarget()).matching(keys).data(travel)); |
| 105 | + } |
| 106 | + context.setCompleted(); |
| 107 | + } |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | +} |
| 110 | +``` |
| 111 | + |
| 112 | +The custom `before` handler reads the travel's `BeginDate` and validates that withdrawal occurs within the allowed timeframe. The custom `on` handler updates the travel status to `Withdrawn` and marks the action as completed. |
| 113 | + |
| 114 | +<!-- |
| 115 | +The custom `On` handler implements the transition by updating the travel status to `Withdrawn`. |
| 116 | +It checks whether the entity is a draft or a non-draft entity and applies the appropriate update logic. |
| 117 | +For draft entities, it uses the `patchDraft` method to update the draft data, while for non-draft entities, it uses the `PersistenceService` to persist the changes. |
| 118 | +Finally, it marks the action as completed. |
| 119 | +--> |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | +The custom `on` handler updates the travel status to `Withdrawn` and marks the action as completed. |
| 122 | + |
| 123 | +::: warning TODO: we should actually do the following! |
| 124 | +-> `withdrawTravel` should only have an additional before check. |
| 125 | +::: |
| 126 | + |
| 127 | +While you could use the `@to` annotation with the default handler, omitting it signals that you implemented custom transition logic. |
| 128 | + |
| 129 | + |
| 130 | +### In Node.js |
| 131 | + |
| 132 | +TODO |
0 commit comments