While this repo has been inactive for quite a long time, spectral remains very useful so I decided to create a fork named speculoos. The idea is to be able to integrate feature that people are asking for and continue improving your work.
I hope you are ok with this. ,
I doubt you will read this since you have not been around for a while. But if you do I will be happy to here from you.
To spectral contributors
@woshilapin, @kirushik, @sazzer, @misos1, @Riduidel, @rrichardson, @viktorchvatal, @edibopp , @kirushik.
Here is what I have done so far :
- making all the doc tests actually pass (except for
Path and PathBuf assertions)
- implemented a
does_not_contain assertion on str/String
Don't hesitate to reopen your issues/PR on speculoos if you still think those are worth it.
I will need some time to get familiar with the whole code base but I will be happy to share ideas on how to improve spectral.
I do not plan to keep repo ownership for myself so if anyone is interested to co-maintain speculoos don't hesitate to reach me.
To @cfrancia,
While this repo has been inactive for quite a long time, spectral remains very useful so I decided to create a fork named speculoos. The idea is to be able to integrate feature that people are asking for and continue improving your work.
I hope you are ok with this. ,
I doubt you will read this since you have not been around for a while. But if you do I will be happy to here from you.
To spectral contributors
@woshilapin, @kirushik, @sazzer, @misos1, @Riduidel, @rrichardson, @viktorchvatal, @edibopp , @kirushik.
Here is what I have done so far :
PathandPathBufassertions)does_not_containassertion onstr/StringDon't hesitate to reopen your issues/PR on speculoos if you still think those are worth it.
I will need some time to get familiar with the whole code base but I will be happy to share ideas on how to improve spectral.
I do not plan to keep repo ownership for myself so if anyone is interested to co-maintain speculoos don't hesitate to reach me.