Skip to content

Fork of spectral #21

@oknozor

Description

@oknozor

To @cfrancia,

While this repo has been inactive for quite a long time, spectral remains very useful so I decided to create a fork named speculoos. The idea is to be able to integrate feature that people are asking for and continue improving your work.

I hope you are ok with this. ,

I doubt you will read this since you have not been around for a while. But if you do I will be happy to here from you.

To spectral contributors

@woshilapin, @kirushik, @sazzer, @misos1, @Riduidel, @rrichardson, @viktorchvatal, @edibopp , @kirushik.

Here is what I have done so far :

  • making all the doc tests actually pass (except for Path and PathBuf assertions)
  • implemented a does_not_contain assertion on str/String

Don't hesitate to reopen your issues/PR on speculoos if you still think those are worth it.
I will need some time to get familiar with the whole code base but I will be happy to share ideas on how to improve spectral.

I do not plan to keep repo ownership for myself so if anyone is interested to co-maintain speculoos don't hesitate to reach me.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions