SlotRecord type alias should be more strict

[qodeboy]

Description

Hello, is there any reason to have SlotRecord as Partial? With current implementation, having incomplete slot recipe configuration does not trigger TS error.

Problem Statement/Justification

For example, following code have slots that were not defined in base:

export const appHeaderRecipe = sva({
  slots: ['header', 'logo'],
  base: {
    header: {
      marginX: 'auto',
    },
  },
});

But because SlotRecord is defined as

type SlotRecord<S extends string, T> = Partial<Record<S, T>>

It will not trigger an error.

But as developer, I would expect TS error in such situations, since object is incomplete/invalid. It will also allow to catch error early.

Is there any specific reason to keep SlotRecord a partial?

Proposed Solution or API

Enforce SlotRecord type alias:

type SlotRecord<S extends string, T> = Record<S, T>

Or allow users to hook in into generated code/types with hook system.

Alternatives

No response

Additional Information

No response