-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy path1625. Lexicographically Smallest String After Applying Operations. 1625. Lexicographically Smallest String After Applying Operations.cpp
More file actions
87 lines (73 loc) · 2.95 KB
/
1625. Lexicographically Smallest String After Applying Operations. 1625. Lexicographically Smallest String After Applying Operations.cpp
File metadata and controls
87 lines (73 loc) · 2.95 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
1625. Lexicographically Smallest String After Applying Operations
Solved
Medium
Topics
premium lock icon
Companies
Hint
You are given a string s of even length consisting of digits from 0 to 9, and two integers a and b.
You can apply either of the following two operations any number of times and in any order on s:
Add a to all odd indices of s (0-indexed). Digits post 9 are cycled back to 0. For example, if s = "3456" and a = 5, s becomes "3951".
Rotate s to the right by b positions. For example, if s = "3456" and b = 1, s becomes "6345".
Return the lexicographically smallest string you can obtain by applying the above operations any number of times on s.
A string a is lexicographically smaller than a string b (of the same length) if in the first position where a and b differ, string a has a letter that appears earlier in the alphabet than the corresponding letter in b. For example, "0158" is lexicographically smaller than "0190" because the first position they differ is at the third letter, and '5' comes before '9'.
Example 1:
Input: s = "5525", a = 9, b = 2
Output: "2050"
Explanation: We can apply the following operations:
Start: "5525"
Rotate: "2555"
Add: "2454"
Add: "2353"
Rotate: "5323"
Add: "5222"
Add: "5121"
Rotate: "2151"
Add: "2050"
There is no way to obtain a string that is lexicographically smaller than "2050".
Example 2:
Input: s = "74", a = 5, b = 1
Output: "24"
Explanation: We can apply the following operations:
Start: "74"
Rotate: "47"
Add: "42"
Rotate: "24"
There is no way to obtain a string that is lexicographically smaller than "24".
Example 3:
Input: s = "0011", a = 4, b = 2
Output: "0011"
Explanation: There are no sequence of operations that will give us a lexicographically smaller string than "0011".
Constraints:
2 <= s.length <= 100
s.length is even.
s consists of digits from 0 to 9 only.
1 <= a <= 9
1 <= b <= s.length - 1class Solution {
public String findLexSmallestString(String s, int a, int b) {
int n = s.length();
boolean[] vis = new boolean[n];
String res = s;
s = s + s;
for (int i = 0; !vis[i]; i = (i + b) % n) {
vis[i] = true;
for (int j = 0; j < 10; j++) {
int kLimit = b % 2 == 0 ? 0 : 9;
for (int k = 0; k <= kLimit; k++) {
char[] t = s.substring(i, i + n).toCharArray();
for (int p = 1; p < n; p += 2) {
t[p] = (char) ('0' + ((t[p] - '0' + j * a) % 10));
}
for (int p = 0; p < n; p += 2) {
t[p] = (char) ('0' + ((t[p] - '0' + k * a) % 10));
}
String tStr = new String(t);
if (tStr.compareTo(res) < 0) {
res = tStr;
}
}
}
}
return res;
}
}