Add DeepCPMatte sphere or cube 3d preview

[falkhofmann]

during some user questioning it came up as an idea to have optional display the sphere or cube in 3d context. in addition/swap to the axis handle.
perhaps with some sort of preview checkbox?

not seeing this as important, rather a nice to have in some scenarios.
therefore documenting the idea here.

[charlesangus]

Yeah, would definitely be helpful. Possibly easiest to implement as a gizmo with a sphere in it, tbh, but should also be an interesting delve into the mysteries of Nuke's handle drawing functionality.

…

On Mon., Jan. 3, 2022, 17:08 Falk Hofmann, ***@***.***> wrote: during some user questioning it came up as an idea to have optional display the sphere or cube in 3d context. in addition/swap to the axis handle. perhaps with some sort of preview checkbox? not seeing this as important, rather a nice to have in some scenarios. therefore documenting the idea here. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#83>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABD5T4MV2LQAZHRSGMPVN3DUUIM55ANCNFSM5LGC2PPQ> . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS <https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675> or Android <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[falkhofmann]

the handle approach would also be my favorite. i think in the nuke example code file is a sphere node to look at.

at the end, it might not be needed as detailed as this since the poly count/resolution is irrelevant, but the transformations need to be applied. also maybe it would be nicer if its not 100% opaque.

but maybe starting of simple is better.