The Fresh Repo Conundrum

[joedevivo]

You check out a fresh repo from github. it's empty, you're psyched. You want to concrete init but that command is really against creating anything if it didn't also create the directory.

➜  new_rep git:(master) ../concrete/concrete init .
ERROR: concrete init wants to create '.', but it already exists

I'll get around to this eventually, but I'll forget if I don't put it here.

[seth]

That's interesting. I've never thought to do it that way. I always have
started with a local repo. So... concrete init. Then setup local git repo.
Then create a repo on git and add the remote and then push.

Not opposed to making it work for other workflows thought for sure!

On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Joe DeVivo notifications@github.com wrote:

You check out a fresh repo from github. it's empty, you're psyched. You
want to concrete init but that command is really against creating
anything if it didn't also create the directory.

➜ new_rep git:(master) ../concrete/concrete init .
ERROR: concrete init wants to create '.', but it already exists

I'll get around to this eventually, but I'll forget if I don't put it here.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#27.