example section under paper buttons

Author: chickymonkeys

content/research/research-3.md

@@ -18,6 +18,19 @@ date:       "2024-12-25"
 type: "Publications"
 ---
 
+<!-- Non devono esserci tutte queste cose per forza, è un esempio di tutte le cose che ci potrebbero andare -->
+<!-- Magari si tolgono gli spazi tra newlines tra i vari item -->
+(example paper update) _New draft available soon!_ or _Conditionally accepted_ at **bla bla bla**.
+
+(example link published paper) [Review of Economic Studies, 2024. Vol. XX, Issue 3, pp. XXXX-XXXX](fakelink).
+
+(example presentations list) Presented at: ASSA 2025, [**EHA 2025**](fakelink), _WEHC 2025_, bla bla.
+
+(example press coverage list) Press coverage: [The Economist](fakelink), [The New York Times](fakelink), [The Washington Post](fakelink).
+
+(example awards list) Awarded the _Best Supercazzola Price_ at the 2024 _Festival della Supercazzola_.
+
+
 How do strengthened church-state relations impact religiosity and social values? To examine, we exploit the staggered introduction of the faith-based initiatives across US states. Introduced by conservative Protestants in the 1990s, these policies aimed to improve conditions for faith-based groups and to increase their numbers. Our difference-in-differences analysis reveals that the initiatives managed to increase the number of faith-based nonprofits and to strengthen religiosity and conservative-religious social views — such as attitudes against LGBTQ+ and abortion. Effects were only felt by Protestants. Notably, 9% of Americans who were not regular churchgoers started attending monthly or more. Of the 10,274 new faith-based organizations during the period, 15% may have opened due to the faith-based initiatives. A back-of-the-envelope calculation suggests that these organizations may potentially have reached 8.2% of American Protestants. Effects are plausibly causal; we find no systematic differences prior to implementation, evidence is robust to using novel staggered-rollout designs, restricting comparison to contiguous counties, and to estimation based on triple differences exploiting religious group heterogeneity. Our results contribute to explaining US polarization and highlight consequences of tightened church-state relations.