redo API

[yoshuawuyts]

var nanorouter = require('nanorouter')

var router = nanorouter()
router.route('default', function (params) {
})

router.route('/foo/:bar', function (params) {
})

router.match(window.location)

Base it on prototypes - and that's it I think ✨

[toddself]

why route instead of on? (I like on since it's sort of like an event emitter -- we're going to trigger this function when this event happens. Its just that the event is the browser's URL being changed)

[yoshuawuyts]

For API parity with server-router mostly, I was thinking

…

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017, 18:08 Todd Kennedy ***@***.***> wrote: why route instead of on? (I like on since it's sort of like an event emitter -- we're going to trigger this function when this event happens. Its just that the event is the browser's URL being changed) — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#6 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACWlel431qaolkluFDmiUc5vE9pA46LNks5sInprgaJpZM4OIFEb> .

[timwis]

Also on might imply multiple handlers would be called if you defined them, and I assume that's not the case (though maybe?).

The use of default as a route like that feels smelly to me, but not sure what to propose instead and you may have already thought about this. What if the way you defined the default route was to define a .route('*', ...) route at the very end? In theory that would work with no code changes, and is thus less API to memorise. Right? Or would it be called in addition to matched handlers..

[yoshuawuyts]

Oh, I like the wildcard thing - def makes sense (:

…

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 1:45 AM Tim Wisniewski ***@***.***> wrote: Also on might imply multiple handlers would be called if you defined them, and I assume that's not the case (though maybe?). The use of default as a route like that feels smelly to me, but not sure what to propose instead and you may have already thought about this. What if the way you defined the default route was to define a .route('*', ...) route at the very end? In theory that would work with no code changes, and is thus less API to memorise. Right? Or would it be called in addition to matched handlers.. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#6 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACWleo7B0nePacFYgzC1vLzoI6S4Si1xks5sIuWsgaJpZM4OIFEb> .