Skip to content

I think the API shouldn't rely on referring to the user type as a string. Instead we should use MapSpec.Value to store the user type. #1847

@RANJITHC1029620

Description

@RANJITHC1029620
No description provided.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions