chore: update compile test

tobyhede · tobyhede · commit 10c8086925a6 · 2025-08-26T13:16:47.000+10:00
diff --git a/tests/ui/compound-index-missing-config.stderr b/tests/ui/compound-index-missing-config.stderr
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 error: Compound attribute was specified but no query options were. Specify how this field should be queried with the attribute #[cipherstash(query = <option>, compound = "email#name")]
- --> tests/./ui/compound-index-missing-config.rs:5:42
+ --> tests/ui/compound-index-missing-config.rs
   |
-5 |     #[cipherstash(compound = "email#name")]
+  |     #[cipherstash(compound = "email#name")]
   |                                          ^
diff --git a/tests/ui/compound-index-missing-field.stderr b/tests/ui/compound-index-missing-field.stderr
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 error: Not all fields were annotated with the #[cipherstash(compound)] attribute. Missing fields: name
- --> tests/./ui/compound-index-missing-field.rs:3:10
+ --> tests/ui/compound-index-missing-field.rs
   |
-3 | #[derive(Encryptable)]
+  | #[derive(Encryptable)]
   |          ^^^^^^^^^^^
   |
   = note: this error originates in the derive macro `Encryptable` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
diff --git a/tests/ui/compound-index-too-many-fields.stderr b/tests/ui/compound-index-too-many-fields.stderr
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 error: Compound index 'email#name' does not include current field 'age'.
- --> tests/./ui/compound-index-too-many-fields.rs:9:36
+ --> tests/ui/compound-index-too-many-fields.rs
   |
-9 |     #[cipherstash(query = "exact", compound = "email#name")]
+  |     #[cipherstash(query = "exact", compound = "email#name")]
   |                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
diff --git a/tests/ui/compound-index-unsupported.stderr b/tests/ui/compound-index-unsupported.stderr
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 error: Unsupported index type: blah
- --> tests/./ui/compound-index-unsupported.rs:8:27
+ --> tests/ui/compound-index-unsupported.rs
   |
-8 |     #[cipherstash(query = "blah", compound = "email#name")]
+  |     #[cipherstash(query = "blah", compound = "email#name")]
   |                           ^^^^^^
diff --git a/tests/ui/index-unsupported.stderr b/tests/ui/index-unsupported.stderr
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 error: Unsupported index type: blah
- --> tests/./ui/index-unsupported.rs:5:27
+ --> tests/ui/index-unsupported.rs
   |
-5 |     #[cipherstash(query = "blah")]
+  |     #[cipherstash(query = "blah")]
   |                           ^^^^^^
diff --git a/tests/ui/invalid-field-name.stderr b/tests/ui/invalid-field-name.stderr
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 error: Invalid field '__name': fields must not be prefixed with __
- --> tests/./ui/invalid-field-name.rs:8:5
+ --> tests/ui/invalid-field-name.rs
   |
-8 |     __name: String
+  |     __name: String
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
diff --git a/tests/ui/no-multi-same-index-per-field.stderr b/tests/ui/no-multi-same-index-per-field.stderr
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 error: Index 'name' with type 'exact' has been defined more than once
- --> tests/./ui/no-multi-same-index-per-field.rs:3:10
+ --> tests/ui/no-multi-same-index-per-field.rs
   |
-3 | #[derive(Encryptable)]
+  | #[derive(Encryptable)]
   |          ^^^^^^^^^^^
   |
   = note: this error originates in the derive macro `Encryptable` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
diff --git a/tests/ui/pk-field-no-partition.stderr b/tests/ui/pk-field-no-partition.stderr
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 error: field named 'pk' must be annotated with #[partition_key]
- --> tests/./ui/pk-field-no-partition.rs:5:5
+ --> tests/ui/pk-field-no-partition.rs
   |
-5 |     pk: String,
+  |     pk: String,
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^
diff --git a/tests/ui/pk-field-wrong-partition.stderr b/tests/ui/pk-field-wrong-partition.stderr
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 error: field 'email' cannot be used as partition key as struct contains field named 'pk' which must be used
- --> tests/./ui/pk-field-wrong-partition.rs:5:5
+ --> tests/ui/pk-field-wrong-partition.rs
   |
-5 | /     #[partition_key]
-6 | |     #[cipherstash(query = "exact", compound = "email#name")]
-7 | |     email: String,
+  | /     #[partition_key]
+  | |     #[cipherstash(query = "exact", compound = "email#name")]
+  | |     email: String,
   | |_________________^
diff --git a/tests/ui/sk-field-no-sort.stderr b/tests/ui/sk-field-no-sort.stderr
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 error: field named 'sk' must be annotated with #[sort_key]
-  --> tests/./ui/sk-field-no-sort.rs:11:5
-   |
-11 |     sk: String,
-   |     ^^^^^^^^^^
+ --> tests/ui/sk-field-no-sort.rs
+  |
+  |     sk: String,
+  |     ^^^^^^^^^^
diff --git a/tests/ui/sk-field-wrong-sort.stderr b/tests/ui/sk-field-wrong-sort.stderr
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 error: field 'name' cannot be used as sort key as struct contains field named 'sk' which must be used
-  --> tests/./ui/sk-field-wrong-sort.rs:8:5
-   |
-8  | /     #[cipherstash(query = "prefix", compound = "email#name")]
-9  | |     #[sort_key]
-10 | |     name: String,
-   | |________________^
+ --> tests/ui/sk-field-wrong-sort.rs
+  |
+  | /     #[cipherstash(query = "prefix", compound = "email#name")]
+  | |     #[sort_key]
+  | |     name: String,
+  | |________________^
diff --git a/tests/ui/using-pk-instead-of-pk-sk.stderr b/tests/ui/using-pk-instead-of-pk-sk.stderr
@@ -1,46 +1,49 @@
 error[E0277]: the trait bound `PkSk: From<&str>` is not satisfied
-  --> tests/./ui/using-pk-instead-of-pk-sk.rs:25:40
-   |
-25 |     let user: Option<User> = table.get("user@example.com").await?;
-   |                                    --- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `From<&str>` is not implemented for `PkSk`, which is required by `&str: Into<_>`
-   |                                    |
-   |                                    required by a bound introduced by this call
-   |
-   = help: the trait `From<(_, _)>` is implemented for `PkSk`
-   = help: for that trait implementation, expected `(_, _)`, found `&str`
-   = note: required for `&str` to implement `Into<PkSk>`
+ --> tests/ui/using-pk-instead-of-pk-sk.rs
+  |
+  |     let user: Option<User> = table.get("user@example.com").await?;
+  |                                    --- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `From<&str>` is not implemented for `PkSk`
+  |                                    |
+  |                                    required by a bound introduced by this call
+  |
+  = help: the trait `From<&str>` is not implemented for `PkSk`
+          but trait `From<(_, _)>` is implemented for it
+  = help: for that trait implementation, expected `(_, _)`, found `&str`
+  = note: required for `&str` to implement `Into<PkSk>`
 note: required by a bound in `EncryptedTable::get`
-  --> src/encrypted_table/mod.rs
-   |
-   |     pub async fn get<T>(&self, k: impl Into<T::PrimaryKey>) -> Result<Option<T>, GetError>
-   |                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `EncryptedTable::get`
+ --> src/encrypted_table/mod.rs
+  |
+  |     pub async fn get<T>(&self, k: impl Into<T::PrimaryKey>) -> Result<Option<T>, GetError>
+  |                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `EncryptedTable::get`
 
 error[E0277]: the trait bound `PkSk: From<&str>` is not satisfied
-  --> tests/./ui/using-pk-instead-of-pk-sk.rs:25:30
-   |
-25 |     let user: Option<User> = table.get("user@example.com").await?;
-   |                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `From<&str>` is not implemented for `PkSk`, which is required by `&str: Into<_>`
-   |
-   = help: the trait `From<(_, _)>` is implemented for `PkSk`
-   = help: for that trait implementation, expected `(_, _)`, found `&str`
-   = note: required for `&str` to implement `Into<PkSk>`
+ --> tests/ui/using-pk-instead-of-pk-sk.rs
+  |
+  |     let user: Option<User> = table.get("user@example.com").await?;
+  |                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `From<&str>` is not implemented for `PkSk`
+  |
+  = help: the trait `From<&str>` is not implemented for `PkSk`
+          but trait `From<(_, _)>` is implemented for it
+  = help: for that trait implementation, expected `(_, _)`, found `&str`
+  = note: required for `&str` to implement `Into<PkSk>`
 note: required by a bound in `EncryptedTable::get`
-  --> src/encrypted_table/mod.rs
-   |
-   |     pub async fn get<T>(&self, k: impl Into<T::PrimaryKey>) -> Result<Option<T>, GetError>
-   |                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `EncryptedTable::get`
+ --> src/encrypted_table/mod.rs
+  |
+  |     pub async fn get<T>(&self, k: impl Into<T::PrimaryKey>) -> Result<Option<T>, GetError>
+  |                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `EncryptedTable::get`
 
 error[E0277]: the trait bound `PkSk: From<&str>` is not satisfied
-  --> tests/./ui/using-pk-instead-of-pk-sk.rs:25:60
-   |
-25 |     let user: Option<User> = table.get("user@example.com").await?;
-   |                                                            ^^^^^ the trait `From<&str>` is not implemented for `PkSk`, which is required by `&str: Into<_>`
-   |
-   = help: the trait `From<(_, _)>` is implemented for `PkSk`
-   = help: for that trait implementation, expected `(_, _)`, found `&str`
-   = note: required for `&str` to implement `Into<PkSk>`
+ --> tests/ui/using-pk-instead-of-pk-sk.rs
+  |
+  |     let user: Option<User> = table.get("user@example.com").await?;
+  |                                                            ^^^^^ the trait `From<&str>` is not implemented for `PkSk`
+  |
+  = help: the trait `From<&str>` is not implemented for `PkSk`
+          but trait `From<(_, _)>` is implemented for it
+  = help: for that trait implementation, expected `(_, _)`, found `&str`
+  = note: required for `&str` to implement `Into<PkSk>`
 note: required by a bound in `EncryptedTable::get`
-  --> src/encrypted_table/mod.rs
-   |
-   |     pub async fn get<T>(&self, k: impl Into<T::PrimaryKey>) -> Result<Option<T>, GetError>
-   |                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `EncryptedTable::get`
+ --> src/encrypted_table/mod.rs
+  |
+  |     pub async fn get<T>(&self, k: impl Into<T::PrimaryKey>) -> Result<Option<T>, GetError>
+  |                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `EncryptedTable::get`

Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@`
`1`	`1`	`error: Compound attribute was specified but no query options were. Specify how this field should be queried with the attribute #[cipherstash(query = <option>, compound = "email#name")]`
`2`		`- --> tests/./ui/compound-index-missing-config.rs:5:42`
	`2`	`+ --> tests/ui/compound-index-missing-config.rs`
`3`	`3`	`\|`
`4`		`-5 \| #[cipherstash(compound = "email#name")]`
	`4`	`+ \| #[cipherstash(compound = "email#name")]`
`5`	`5`	`\| ^`
Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@`
`1`	`1`	`error: Not all fields were annotated with the #[cipherstash(compound)] attribute. Missing fields: name`
`2`		`- --> tests/./ui/compound-index-missing-field.rs:3:10`
	`2`	`+ --> tests/ui/compound-index-missing-field.rs`
`3`	`3`	`\|`
`4`		`-3 \| #[derive(Encryptable)]`
	`4`	`+ \| #[derive(Encryptable)]`
`5`	`5`	`\| ^^^^^^^^^^^`
`6`	`6`	`\|`
`7`	`7`	= note: this error originates in the derive macro `Encryptable` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@`
`1`	`1`	`error: Compound index 'email#name' does not include current field 'age'.`
`2`		`- --> tests/./ui/compound-index-too-many-fields.rs:9:36`
	`2`	`+ --> tests/ui/compound-index-too-many-fields.rs`
`3`	`3`	`\|`
`4`		`-9 \| #[cipherstash(query = "exact", compound = "email#name")]`
	`4`	`+ \| #[cipherstash(query = "exact", compound = "email#name")]`
`5`	`5`	`\| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^`
Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@`
`1`	`1`	`error: Unsupported index type: blah`
`2`		`- --> tests/./ui/compound-index-unsupported.rs:8:27`
	`2`	`+ --> tests/ui/compound-index-unsupported.rs`
`3`	`3`	`\|`
`4`		`-8 \| #[cipherstash(query = "blah", compound = "email#name")]`
	`4`	`+ \| #[cipherstash(query = "blah", compound = "email#name")]`
`5`	`5`	`\| ^^^^^^`
Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@`
`1`	`1`	`error: Unsupported index type: blah`
`2`		`- --> tests/./ui/index-unsupported.rs:5:27`
	`2`	`+ --> tests/ui/index-unsupported.rs`
`3`	`3`	`\|`
`4`		`-5 \| #[cipherstash(query = "blah")]`
	`4`	`+ \| #[cipherstash(query = "blah")]`
`5`	`5`	`\| ^^^^^^`
Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@`
`1`	`1`	`error: Invalid field '__name': fields must not be prefixed with __`
`2`		`- --> tests/./ui/invalid-field-name.rs:8:5`
	`2`	`+ --> tests/ui/invalid-field-name.rs`
`3`	`3`	`\|`
`4`		`-8 \| __name: String`
	`4`	`+ \| __name: String`
`5`	`5`	`\| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^`
Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@`
`1`	`1`	`error: Index 'name' with type 'exact' has been defined more than once`
`2`		`- --> tests/./ui/no-multi-same-index-per-field.rs:3:10`
	`2`	`+ --> tests/ui/no-multi-same-index-per-field.rs`
`3`	`3`	`\|`
`4`		`-3 \| #[derive(Encryptable)]`
	`4`	`+ \| #[derive(Encryptable)]`
`5`	`5`	`\| ^^^^^^^^^^^`
`6`	`6`	`\|`
`7`	`7`	= note: this error originates in the derive macro `Encryptable` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@`
`1`	`1`	`error: field named 'pk' must be annotated with #[partition_key]`
`2`		`- --> tests/./ui/pk-field-no-partition.rs:5:5`
	`2`	`+ --> tests/ui/pk-field-no-partition.rs`
`3`	`3`	`\|`
`4`		`-5 \| pk: String,`
	`4`	`+ \| pk: String,`
`5`	`5`	`\| ^^^^^^^^^^`