|
| 1 | +# Security Policy |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +CipherStash takes the security of our software, infrastructure, and customers extremely seriously. |
| 4 | +This document describes the security posture, reporting process, and guidelines for the `protectjs` repository and associated packages. |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | +## Supported Packages |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +This repository contains the JavaScript/TypeScript SDK for CipherStash Protect and related packages. |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +The below tables list each package along with the currently supported (receiving security updates). |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +### `@cipherstash/protect` |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +| Version | Supported | |
| 15 | +| ------- | ------------------ | |
| 16 | +| 10.1.x | :white_check_mark: | |
| 17 | +| 9.6.x | :white_check_mark: | |
| 18 | +| < 9.6 | :x: | |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +### `@cipherstash/drizzle` |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +| Version | Supported | |
| 23 | +| ------- | ------------------ | |
| 24 | +| 1.1.x | :white_check_mark: | |
| 25 | +| < 1.1 | :x: | |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +### `@cipherstash/schema` |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +| Version | Supported | |
| 30 | +| ------- | ------------------ | |
| 31 | +| 2.0.x | :white_check_mark: | |
| 32 | +| < 2.0 | :x: | |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +### `@cipherstash/protect-dynamodb` |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +| Version | Supported | |
| 37 | +| ------- | ------------------ | |
| 38 | +| 5.1.x | :white_check_mark: | |
| 39 | +| < 5.1 | :x: | |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +### `@cipherstash/nextjs` |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +| Version | Supported | |
| 44 | +| ------- | ------------------ | |
| 45 | +| 4.0.x | :white_check_mark: | |
| 46 | +| < 4.0 | :x: | |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | +All packages follow semantic versioning and undergo internal security review, automated analysis, and reproducible builds as part of our SDLC. |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +--- |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +## Reporting a Vulnerability |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +If you believe you have found a security vulnerability in any CipherStash code, service, or dependency: |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +📧 **Please email: `[email protected]`** |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +We request that you **do not publicly disclose** the issue before we have had a chance to investigate and provide a fix. |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | +When reporting, please include (as applicable): |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +- Description of the vulnerability |
| 63 | +- Steps to reproduce |
| 64 | +- Impact assessment or potential misuse |
| 65 | +- Any relevant logs, PoCs, or screenshots |
| 66 | +- Suggested remediation (if you have one) |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +We will acknowledge receipt within **48 hours** and provide regular updates until the issue is resolved. |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | +--- |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +## Disclosure & Response Policy |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +CipherStash follows a **coordinated responsible disclosure** process: |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | +1. **Submit report ** privately via `[email protected]`. |
| 77 | +2. **Acknowledgement** within 48 hours. |
| 78 | +3. **Assessment** of severity using CVSS and internal risk models. |
| 79 | +4. **Fix development** and patch release in a private branch. |
| 80 | +5. **Coordinated disclosure**, including: |
| 81 | + - New patch release(s) |
| 82 | + - Security advisory on GitHub |
| 83 | + - Credit to reporter (optional) |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | +We will never take legal action against good-faith security researchers who follow this policy. |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | +--- |
| 88 | + |
| 89 | +## Scope |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +The following are **in scope**: |
| 92 | + |
| 93 | +- The `cipherstash/protectjs` GitHub repository |
| 94 | +- All published NPM packages under the `@cipherstash/protect*` namespace |
| 95 | +- Protect.js cryptographic implementations, configuration layers, and CLI tooling |
| 96 | +- Key-handling, authenticated encryption behaviour, JSON/JSONB field-level encryption flows |
| 97 | +- Documentation or code examples that could lead to insecure usage |
| 98 | +- CipherStash’s internal infrastructure |
| 99 | +- CipherStash Proxy, ZeroKMS, or other backend products |
| 100 | + |
| 101 | +The following are **out of scope**: |
| 102 | + |
| 103 | +- Example applications in the `examples` dir (though we are still grateful for any relevant disclosires there) |
| 104 | +- Social engineering, physical attacks, or denial-of-service |
| 105 | +- Attacks requiring privileged access to developer machines or CI/CD infrastructure |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | +--- |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | +## Security Guidelines for Contributors |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | +To maintain a strong security posture, contributors MUST: |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | +### ⚙️ Follow cryptographic safety rules |
| 114 | +- Do **not** modify cryptographic primitives without prior discussion |
| 115 | +- Avoid introducing new crypto dependencies without prior discussion |
| 116 | +- Never check in test keys, secrets, or example credentials |
| 117 | + |
| 118 | +### 🛡 Coding & dependency hygiene |
| 119 | +- Avoid adding dependencies unless necessary |
| 120 | +- Keep dependencies updated and vetted |
| 121 | +- Use TypeScript for all new code |
| 122 | +- Ensure all code paths that handle keys or encrypted data include type-safe boundaries |
| 123 | + |
| 124 | +### 🔍 Testing & review |
| 125 | +- Submit PRs with tests covering edge cases and misuse-resistant behaviour |
| 126 | +- Flag any changes involving key derivation, key wrapping, AAD, or encryption modes for mandatory security review |
| 127 | +- Do not merge PRs that downgrade security controls or introduce unsafe defaults |
| 128 | + |
| 129 | +--- |
| 130 | + |
| 131 | +## Questions? |
| 132 | + |
| 133 | +For general questions about CipherStash security practices (not security incidents), contact: |
| 134 | + |
| 135 | + |
| 136 | + |
| 137 | +For vulnerability disclosures: |
| 138 | + |
| 139 | + |
| 140 | + |
| 141 | +--- |
| 142 | + |
| 143 | +Thank you for helping keep `protectjs` and the wider CipherStash ecosystem secure. |
0 commit comments