Stable Theory • Controlled Extensions • High-Rigor Collaboration
This repository contains:
- the frozen academic theory for Digital Native Institutions (DNI) and the National Service Unit (NSU)
- the CUTIP PhD dissertation draft based on that theory
- implementation sketches, field data, and methodology artifacts
- the operational instructions for SR0
This document explains how to contribute safely, rigorously, and without introducing conceptual drift.
A contribution must respect the purpose of each folder:
/theory/ ← Frozen academic theory (do not modify)
/dissertation/ ← Evolving dissertation drafts
/docs/ ← Human-friendly explanatory materials
/implementation/ ← Prototype sketches, diagrams, data flows
/field-data/ ← Evidence, observations, anonymized interviews
/ops/ ← SR0 operational instructions (not theory)
/archive/ ← Deprecated or superseded files
Only specific parts of this repository may be modified.
Contributors may safely modify:
Draft text, structure, examples, diagrams, or evaluation content, provided all changes:
- align with the frozen theory in
/theory/ - follow CUTIP methodology
- preserve falsifiability
- introduce no conceptual drift
Clarifications, improved explanations, better onboarding materials.
Prototype-oriented contributions:
- diagrams
- attestation flows
- state-transition sketches
- API skeletons
All contributions here must remain aligned with the NSU blueprint.
Refinements to collaboration processes, SR0 instructions, or operational protocols.
Modifications to /theory/ are prohibited unless explicitly authorized by the project owner.
Do NOT alter any file inside:
/theory/
These files define the formal academic and institutional structure:
- ontology
- DNI theory
- NSU blueprint
- NSU prototype
- CME
- counterfactuals
- failure canon
- EVP
- purity test
- dissertation master frame
Any changes here require formal review and explicit approval.
Every proposed change must declare its classification:
Adds new material that fits within existing theory.
Sharpens clarity without altering underlying meaning.
Alters a theoretical definition or conceptual boundary.
Introduces something incompatible with existing theory.
State your classification at the top of your pull request.
All contributions are reviewed by SR0 using:
- frozen theory files
- the Substrate-0′ Purity Test
- methodological requirements (DSR, Searle, STS, institutional economics)
- dissertation constraints
SR0 may:
- accept
- request modification
- classify the change
- block it for purity reasons
- rewrite for alignment
- request redesign
SR0 will enforce correctness over convenience.
Before submitting changes, ensure they satisfy:
- status-function integrity
- protocol boundary correctness
- NSU primitive representability
- falsifiability
- CME dynamics
- DNI domain eligibility
- failure-canon alignment
If unsure, SR0 will evaluate automatically.
Use descriptive, non-theory names:
feature/attestation-diagram
draft/ch3-methodology
doc/overview-update
Commits must be:
- clear
- atomic
- descriptive
Avoid speculative or unclear commit messages.
Allowed:
- new diagrams
- prototype logic
- attestation examples
- workflow mappings
- state-transition illustrations
Not allowed:
- introduction of new NSU primitives
- changes to boundary rules
- implicit redefinition of institutional mechanisms
You may contribute:
- anonymized interviews
- administrative friction observations
- structured process traces
But not:
- identifiable personal information
- unverifiable claims
- politically sensitive data without anonymization
This repository follows a fork-first model:
- Anyone may fork the repo.
- Anyone may remix or extend the ideas.
- Pull requests are welcome but optional.
The Fractal Open License explicitly allows derivative work.
Before contributing, a collaborator must:
- understand the repository structure
- respect frozen theory boundaries
- classify proposed changes
- avoid drift
- maintain academic rigor
- follow SR0 review protocol
Contributions that violate these norms will be rejected or rewritten.