Python: Add simple test of DataFlowCall

Notice the strange thing with treating `mypkg.foo(42)` as a ClassCall,
but completely ignoring `mypkg.subpkg.bar(43)` -- due to having the two
`ClassValue`s:

- `Missing module attribute mypkg.foo`
- `Missing module attribute mypkg.subpkg`

But not `Missing module attribute mypkg.subpkg` with the current import
structure.

Author: RasmusWL

python/ql/test/experimental/dataflow/calls/DataFlowCallTest.expected

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+import python
+import semmle.python.dataflow.new.DataFlow
+import semmle.python.dataflow.new.internal.DataFlowPrivate
+import TestUtilities.InlineExpectationsTest
+private import semmle.python.dataflow.new.internal.PrintNode
+
+class DataFlowCallTest extends InlineExpectationsTest {
+  DataFlowCallTest() { this = "DataFlowCallTest" }
+
+  override string getARelevantTag() {
+    result in ["call", "qlclass"]
+    or
+    result = "arg_" + [0 .. 10]
+  }
+
+  override predicate hasActualResult(Location location, string element, string tag, string value) {
+    exists(location.getFile().getRelativePath()) and
+    exists(DataFlowCall call |
+      location = call.getLocation() and
+      element = call.toString()
+    |
+      value = prettyExpr(call.getNode().getNode()) and
+      tag = "call"
+      or
+      value = call.getAQlClass() and
+      tag = "qlclass"
+      or
+      exists(int n, DataFlow::Node arg | arg = call.getArg(n) |
+        value = prettyNodeForInlineTest(arg) and
+        tag = "arg_" + n
+      )
+    )
+  }
+}

python/ql/test/experimental/dataflow/calls/DataFlowCallTest.ql

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+# A very basic test of DataFlowCall
+#
+# see `coverage/argumentRoutingTest.ql` for a more in depth test of argument routing
+# handling.
+
+def func(arg):
+    pass
+
+
+class MyClass(object):
+    def __init__(self, arg):
+        pass
+
+    def my_method(self, arg):
+        pass
+
+    def __getitem__(self, key):
+        pass
+
+
+func("foo") # $ call=func(..) qlclass=FunctionCall arg_0="foo"
+x = MyClass(1) # $ call=MyClass(..) qlclass=ClassCall arg_0=[pre]MyClass(..) arg_1=1
+x.my_method(2) # $ call=x.my_method(..) qlclass=MethodCall arg_0=x arg_1=2
+mm = x.my_method
+mm(2) # $ call=mm(..) qlclass=MethodCall arg_1=2 MISSING: arg_0=x
+x[3] # $ call=x[3] qlclass=SpecialCall arg_0=x arg_1=3
+
+
+try:
+    # These are included to show how we handle absent things with points-to where
+    # `mypkg.foo` is a `missing module variable`, but `mypkg.subpkg.bar` is compeltely
+    # ignored.
+    import mypkg
+    mypkg.foo(42) # $ call=mypkg.foo(..) qlclass=ClassCall arg_0=[pre]mypkg.foo(..)
+    mypkg.subpkg.bar(43)
+except:
+    pass