Commit d4ccd54
exit: Put an upper limit on how often we can oops
Many Linux systems are configured to not panic on oops; but allowing an
attacker to oops the system **really** often can make even bugs that look
completely unexploitable exploitable (like NULL dereferences and such) if
each crash elevates a refcount by one or a lock is taken in read mode, and
this causes a counter to eventually overflow.
The most interesting counters for this are 32 bits wide (like open-coded
refcounts that don't use refcount_t). (The ldsem reader count on 32-bit
platforms is just 16 bits, but probably nobody cares about 32-bit platforms
that much nowadays.)
So let's panic the system if the kernel is constantly oopsing.
The speed of oopsing 2^32 times probably depends on several factors, like
how long the stack trace is and which unwinder you're using; an empirically
important one is whether your console is showing a graphical environment or
a text console that oopses will be printed to.
In a quick single-threaded benchmark, it looks like oopsing in a vfork()
child with a very short stack trace only takes ~510 microseconds per run
when a graphical console is active; but switching to a text console that
oopses are printed to slows it down around 87x, to ~45 milliseconds per
run.
(Adding more threads makes this faster, but the actual oops printing
happens under &die_lock on x86, so you can maybe speed this up by a factor
of around 2 and then any further improvement gets eaten up by lock
contention.)
It looks like it would take around 8-12 days to overflow a 32-bit counter
with repeated oopsing on a multi-core X86 system running a graphical
environment; both me (in an X86 VM) and Seth (with a distro kernel on
normal hardware in a standard configuration) got numbers in that ballpark.
12 days aren't *that* short on a desktop system, and you'd likely need much
longer on a typical server system (assuming that people don't run graphical
desktop environments on their servers), and this is a *very* noisy and
violent approach to exploiting the kernel; and it also seems to take orders
of magnitude longer on some machines, probably because stuff like EFI
pstore will slow it down a ton if that's active.
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]1 parent 9360d03 commit d4ccd54
2 files changed
+50
-0
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
667 | 667 | | |
668 | 668 | | |
669 | 669 | | |
| 670 | + | |
| 671 | + | |
| 672 | + | |
| 673 | + | |
| 674 | + | |
| 675 | + | |
| 676 | + | |
| 677 | + | |
670 | 678 | | |
671 | 679 | | |
672 | 680 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
72 | 72 | | |
73 | 73 | | |
74 | 74 | | |
| 75 | + | |
| 76 | + | |
| 77 | + | |
| 78 | + | |
| 79 | + | |
| 80 | + | |
| 81 | + | |
| 82 | + | |
| 83 | + | |
| 84 | + | |
| 85 | + | |
| 86 | + | |
| 87 | + | |
| 88 | + | |
| 89 | + | |
| 90 | + | |
| 91 | + | |
| 92 | + | |
| 93 | + | |
| 94 | + | |
| 95 | + | |
| 96 | + | |
| 97 | + | |
| 98 | + | |
| 99 | + | |
| 100 | + | |
| 101 | + | |
75 | 102 | | |
76 | 103 | | |
77 | 104 | | |
| |||
874 | 901 | | |
875 | 902 | | |
876 | 903 | | |
| 904 | + | |
| 905 | + | |
877 | 906 | | |
878 | 907 | | |
879 | 908 | | |
| |||
897 | 926 | | |
898 | 927 | | |
899 | 928 | | |
| 929 | + | |
| 930 | + | |
| 931 | + | |
| 932 | + | |
| 933 | + | |
| 934 | + | |
| 935 | + | |
| 936 | + | |
| 937 | + | |
| 938 | + | |
| 939 | + | |
| 940 | + | |
| 941 | + | |
900 | 942 | | |
901 | 943 | | |
902 | 944 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments