Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Thank you for your feedback, Its something we have been discussing for a while, so definitely interesting. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
From what I found, currently, LavinMQ supports basic redelivery behavior, but retry logic is fairly limited and uniform. In real-world systems, different consumers and message types often require different retry strategies (e.g., immediate retries, exponential backoff, fixed delays, or custom retry schedules).
Without flexible retry strategies, it’s difficult to balance fast recovery from transient failures with protecting downstream systems from overload or retry storms. This often forces retry logic to be implemented at the application level, leading to duplicated, inconsistent, and harder-to-maintain code.
Describe the solution you'd like
I’d like LavinMQ to support configurable redelivery retry strategies at the broker level. Examples of such strategies could include:
BullMQ has a very clear and well-documented model for retrying failed jobs that demonstrates the flexibility and ergonomics this feature could have:
https://docs.bullmq.io/guide/retrying-failing-jobs
Describe alternatives you've considered
I've tried implementing retry logic entirely in consumers (timers, delayed requeueing, backoff logic). This increases complexity and duplicates logic across services.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions