Hibernatable Client WebSockets #1440
helloimalastair
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
I think this "ought to" be supported, that is, it makes sense technically. I don't think this is something we're likely to work on in the near future, though. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
At the moment, the Hibernatable WebSockets API, while appearing client/server agnostic from the types, only functions with Server-side WebSockets(where the DurableObject is the Server). Would it be possible to add support for Client-side WebSockets to hibernate as well? This would be nice for consuming a WebSocket-based API(real-time data of some kind), and reducing the number of times you have to restart a WebSocket due to a DO getting evicted.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions