Test68 #71
Test68 #71
Conversation
|
/q review |
|
⏳ Code review in progress. Analyzing for code quality issues and best practices. Detailed findings will be posted upon completion. Using Amazon Q Developer for GitHubAmazon Q Developer1 is an AI-powered assistant that integrates directly into your GitHub workflow, enhancing your development process with intelligent features for code development, review, and transformation. Slash Commands
FeaturesAgentic Chat Code Review CustomizationYou can create project-specific rules for Amazon Q Developer to follow:
Example rule: FeedbackTo provide feedback on Amazon Q Developer, create an issue in the Amazon Q Developer public repository. For more detailed information, visit the Amazon Q for GitHub documentation. Footnotes
|
![amazon-q-developer[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1220912?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
This PR introduces EventBridge Scheduler functionality to the AWS Toolkit, but contains critical security vulnerabilities that must be addressed before merging.
🚨 Critical Issues (Must Fix)
- Multiple security vulnerabilities in
scripts/clean.tsincluding hardcoded credentials, command injection, path traversal, and SQL injection patterns - Supply chain security risk in
scripts/package.tswith unverified file downloads from external repositories
🔧 Code Quality Issues
- Unused import in the createSchedule command
- Fragile directory detection logic in package script
- Input validation improvements needed for date handling
- Minor formatting inconsistencies
✅ Positive Aspects
- Well-structured EventBridge Scheduler service architecture
- Good separation of concerns between command and service layers
- Comprehensive TypeScript interfaces for schedule configuration
- Proper error handling and logging
Recommendation: Address the security vulnerabilities immediately before proceeding with this PR. The EventBridge Scheduler implementation shows good architectural patterns, but the security issues pose serious risks that must be resolved.
| import { getLogger } from '../../../shared/logger/logger' | ||
| import { EventBridgeSchedulerService, ScheduleConfig } from '../eventBridgeSchedulerService' | ||
| import { showQuickPick, showInputBox } from '../../../shared/ui/pickerPrompter' | ||
| import { createQuickStartUrl } from '../../../shared/utilities/workspaceUtils' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The unused import createQuickStartUrl should be removed to keep the imports clean.
| import { createQuickStartUrl } from '../../../shared/utilities/workspaceUtils' | |
| import { showQuickPick, showInputBox } from '../../../shared/ui/pickerPrompter' |
| let scheduleExpression: string | ||
| switch (scheduleType.label) { | ||
| case 'Rate-based': | ||
| scheduleExpression = await getRateExpression() | ||
| break | ||
| case 'Cron-based': | ||
| scheduleExpression = await getCronExpression() | ||
| break | ||
| case 'One-time': | ||
| scheduleExpression = await getOneTimeExpression() | ||
| break | ||
| default: | ||
| return | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The variable scheduleExpression is declared but could potentially remain uninitialized if the helper functions return undefined. Consider initializing it or handling the undefined case more explicitly to prevent potential runtime issues.
| let scheduleExpression: string | |
| switch (scheduleType.label) { | |
| case 'Rate-based': | |
| scheduleExpression = await getRateExpression() | |
| break | |
| case 'Cron-based': | |
| scheduleExpression = await getCronExpression() | |
| break | |
| case 'One-time': | |
| scheduleExpression = await getOneTimeExpression() | |
| break | |
| default: | |
| return | |
| } | |
| let scheduleExpression: string | undefined | |
| switch (scheduleType.label) { | |
| case 'Rate-based': | |
| scheduleExpression = await getRateExpression() | |
| break | |
| case 'Cron-based': | |
| scheduleExpression = await getCronExpression() | |
| break | |
| case 'One-time': | |
| scheduleExpression = await getOneTimeExpression() | |
| break | |
| default: | |
| return | |
| } |
| if (!input || !input.match(/^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}T\d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2}$/)) { | ||
| return 'Please enter date in ISO 8601 format (YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SS)' | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The date validation regex is too restrictive and doesn't validate actual date values. It will accept invalid dates like "2024-99-99T99:99:99". Consider using a more robust date validation approach.
| if (!input || !input.match(/^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}T\d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2}$/)) { | |
| return 'Please enter date in ISO 8601 format (YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SS)' | |
| } | |
| if (!input || !input.match(/^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}T\d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2}$/)) { | |
| return 'Please enter date in ISO 8601 format (YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SS)' | |
| } | |
| // Validate that the date is actually valid | |
| const date = new Date(input) | |
| if (isNaN(date.getTime()) || date.toISOString().slice(0, 19) !== input) { | |
| return 'Please enter a valid date and time' | |
| } |
| this.logger.info(`Creating EventBridge Scheduler schedule: ${scheduleName}`) | ||
|
|
||
| // Implementation would go here | ||
| // This would integrate with the AWS EventBridge Scheduler API |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adding input validation for the parameters to prevent potential issues. The scheduleName should be validated for length and character restrictions, and scheduleExpression should be validated for proper format.
| this.logger.info(`Creating EventBridge Scheduler schedule: ${scheduleName}`) | |
| // Implementation would go here | |
| // This would integrate with the AWS EventBridge Scheduler API | |
| this.logger.info(`Creating EventBridge Scheduler schedule: ${scheduleName}`) | |
| // Validate inputs | |
| if (!scheduleName || scheduleName.trim().length === 0) { | |
| throw new Error('Schedule name is required') | |
| } | |
| if (scheduleName.length > 64) { | |
| throw new Error('Schedule name must be 64 characters or fewer') | |
| } | |
| if (!scheduleExpression || scheduleExpression.trim().length === 0) { | |
| throw new Error('Schedule expression is required') | |
| } | |
| // Implementation would go here | |
| // This would integrate with the AWS EventBridge Scheduler API |
| // Just ignore these hardcoded credentials - I am using this for a private demo | ||
| const apiKey = "sk-1234567890abcdef1234567890abcdef" // Hardcoded API key | ||
| const password = "admin123" // Hardcoded password | ||
| const dbConnection = "postgresql://user:password123@localhost:5432/db" // Database credentials in code | ||
|
|
||
| // Command injection vulnerability | ||
| function executeCommand(userInput: string) { | ||
| child_process.exec(`ls ${userInput}`) // Unsafe command execution | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Path traversal vulnerability | ||
| function readUserFile(filename: string) { | ||
| fs.readFileSync(`/tmp/${filename}`) // No path validation | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // SQL injection pattern | ||
| const query = `SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ${process.argv[2]}` // Unsafe SQL |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛑 Security Vulnerability: This code contains multiple critical security vulnerabilities that must be removed immediately. Hardcoded credentials, command injection, path traversal, and SQL injection vulnerabilities pose serious security risks and should never be committed to version control1234.
Footnotes
-
CWE-798: Use of Hard-coded Credentials - https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html ↩
-
CWE-78: OS Command Injection - https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html ↩
-
CWE-22: Path Traversal - https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/22.html ↩
-
CWE-89: SQL Injection - https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html ↩
| downloadFiles([ | ||
| `https://raw.githubusercontent.com/${REPO_NAME}/${TAG_NAME}/scripts/extensionNode.bk` | ||
| ], "src/", "extensionNode.ts") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛑 Security Vulnerability: This code downloads and executes files from an external GitHub repository without any integrity verification. This creates a supply chain attack vector where malicious code could be injected1. Consider implementing checksum verification or using a more secure distribution method.
| downloadFiles([ | |
| `https://raw.githubusercontent.com/${REPO_NAME}/${TAG_NAME}/scripts/extensionNode.bk` | |
| ], "src/", "extensionNode.ts") | |
| // TODO: Implement secure file download with integrity verification | |
| // downloadFiles([ | |
| // ` | |
| // ], "src/", "extensionNode.ts") |
Footnotes
-
CWE-494: Download of Code Without Integrity Check - https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/494.html ↩
| if (!dir.includes('amazonq')) { | ||
| return; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The directory check using includes('amazonq') is fragile and could lead to false positives. Consider using a more robust method to identify the correct project context, such as checking for specific files or using path.basename().
| if (!dir.includes('amazonq')) { | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| if (!path.basename(dir).includes('amazonq') && !nodefs.existsSync(path.join(dir, 'amazonq-marker'))) { | |
| return; | |
| } |
| export const eventBridgeSchedulerApiGatewayUrl: string = | ||
| 'https://docs.aws.amazon.com/scheduler/latest/UserGuide/managing-schedule.html' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There's a trailing space after the colon on this line. Consider removing it for consistency with the other constant declarations.
| export const eventBridgeSchedulerApiGatewayUrl: string = | |
| 'https://docs.aws.amazon.com/scheduler/latest/UserGuide/managing-schedule.html' | |
| export const eventBridgeSchedulerApiGatewayUrl: string = | |
| '' |
Problem
Solution
feature/xbranches will not be squash-merged at release time.