Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 13, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@Swatinem
Copy link
Contributor

Now that the testsuite does not use mostly the slow TransactionTestCase, but the faster TestCase, it should execute considerably faster.

Hopefully fast enough that we don’t need to split the testsuite anymore, so lets try :-)


Pretty much reverts #1144

Now that the testsuite does not use mostly the slow `TransactionTestCase`, but the faster `TestCase`, it should execute considerably faster.

Hopefully fast enough that we don’t need to split the testsuite anymore, so lets try :-)
@Swatinem Swatinem self-assigned this Mar 17, 2025
@seer-by-sentry
Copy link
Contributor

seer-by-sentry bot commented Mar 17, 2025

✅ Sentry found no issues in your recent changes ✅

@Swatinem Swatinem requested a review from a team as a code owner March 17, 2025 15:59
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 17, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.86%. Comparing base (786d94a) to head (935eeb1).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1213   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.86%   95.86%           
=======================================
  Files         493      493           
  Lines       16871    16871           
=======================================
  Hits        16174    16174           
  Misses        697      697           
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 95.86% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@codecov-notifications
Copy link

codecov-notifications bot commented Mar 17, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@Swatinem Swatinem requested a review from ajay-sentry March 17, 2025 17:03
@ajay-sentry ajay-sentry added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 17, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit b4563c1 Mar 17, 2025
23 of 24 checks passed
@ajay-sentry ajay-sentry deleted the swatinem/merge-tests branch March 17, 2025 19:50
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants