Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 13, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@spalmurray-codecov
Copy link
Contributor

@spalmurray-codecov spalmurray-codecov commented Mar 18, 2025

Adds a component filter for our coverage badge.

Closes codecov/engineering-team#3223

Examples
Gazebo total:
codecov
https://stage-web.codecov.dev/github/codecov/gazebo/graph/badge.svg?token=DUTYQE693J&precision=2

Gazebo Pages component (by name):
codecov
https://stage-web.codecov.dev/github/codecov/gazebo/graph/badge.svg?token=DUTYQE693J&precision=2&component=Pages

Gazebo Pages component (by id):
codecov
https://stage-web.codecov.dev/github/codecov/gazebo/graph/badge.svg?token=DUTYQE693J&precision=2&component=dir_pages

(and I have confirmed these are correct lol)

@seer-by-sentry
Copy link
Contributor

seer-by-sentry bot commented Mar 18, 2025

✅ Sentry found no issues in your recent changes ✅

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 18, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.31%. Comparing base (cbf24c4) to head (ef4592b).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1216   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.31%   96.31%           
=======================================
  Files         492      492           
  Lines       16826    16844   +18     
=======================================
+ Hits        16206    16224   +18     
  Misses        620      620           
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 96.31% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@codecov-notifications
Copy link

codecov-notifications bot commented Mar 18, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@spalmurray spalmurray force-pushed the spalmurray/component-badges branch 2 times, most recently from 277c9d3 to 1d7d17f Compare March 24, 2025 12:24
Copy link
Contributor

@ajay-sentry ajay-sentry left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good!

@spalmurray spalmurray force-pushed the spalmurray/component-badges branch from 1d7d17f to ef4592b Compare March 24, 2025 20:21
@spalmurray spalmurray added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 25, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Mar 25, 2025
@spalmurray spalmurray added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 25, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 3b18f44 Mar 25, 2025
23 of 24 checks passed
@spalmurray spalmurray deleted the spalmurray/component-badges branch March 25, 2025 12:35
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Component Badges

4 participants