Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 13, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@Swatinem
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@Swatinem Swatinem requested a review from a team March 31, 2025 13:03
@Swatinem Swatinem self-assigned this Mar 31, 2025
@seer-by-sentry
Copy link
Contributor

✅ Sentry found no issues in your recent changes ✅

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 31, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.32%. Comparing base (6e6d2be) to head (4a5ec5e).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1259      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.31%   96.32%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         492      492              
  Lines       16805    16882      +77     
==========================================
+ Hits        16185    16262      +77     
  Misses        620      620              
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 96.32% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@codecov-notifications
Copy link

codecov-notifications bot commented Mar 31, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@Swatinem Swatinem added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 31, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 450c398 Mar 31, 2025
23 of 24 checks passed
@Swatinem Swatinem deleted the swatinem/rm-reportdetails branch March 31, 2025 13:38
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants