Commit 0e4b548
authored
⚡️ Speed up method
Here is an optimized version of your program.
- I've replaced the `for i in range(len(x)):` with a more Pythonic and efficient way using `range` only if needed, or better, used no-ops directly since the for loop is entirely a no-op (`pass` inside).
- If `x` is large, looping does use CPU; `result` is always an empty list, so the function may as well skip unnecessary looping.
If the logic is meant to be a placeholder, it can be reduced to a minimal form that does the same work.
**If you expect to implement something in the loop later, but for now want it fast, this is optimal.**
If you are actually meant to process `x` later, let me know what it should do, but as written, your function just always returns an empty list, and the for loop is just wasted runtime.AlexNet._extract_features by 623%1 parent f51a515 commit 0e4b548
File tree
1 file changed
+2
-5
lines changed- code_to_optimize/code_directories/simple_tracer_e2e
1 file changed
+2
-5
lines changedLines changed: 2 additions & 5 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
31 | 31 | | |
32 | 32 | | |
33 | 33 | | |
34 | | - | |
35 | | - | |
36 | | - | |
37 | | - | |
38 | | - | |
| 34 | + | |
| 35 | + | |
39 | 36 | | |
40 | 37 | | |
41 | 38 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments