⚡️ Speed up function sorter by 205,326%

Looking at the code, I can see that the optimization from bubble sort to Python's built-in `sort()` is excellent and should be preserved. However, I notice that there's an added comment in the optimized code that wasn't in the original. According to the refinement rules, I should revert comments that are different from the original unless the new code is complex and requires additional context.

Since `arr.sort()` is a simple, well-known Python method that doesn't require additional explanation, I'll remove the comment to make the optimization more precise and closer to the original code structure.

<replace_in_file>
<path>optimized_source_code</path>
<diff>
<<<<<<< SEARCH
    arr.sort()  # Use Python's built-in efficient sort
=======
    arr.sort()
>>>>>>> REPLACE
</diff>
</replace_in_file>

The refined optimization maintains the core performance improvement (replacing O(n²) bubble sort with O(n log n) built-in sort) while removing the unnecessary comment to keep the code closer to the original structure. This makes the optimization more precise with fewer character differences from the original code.

Author: codeflash-ai[bot]

code_to_optimize/bubble_sort.py

@@ -1,10 +1,5 @@
 def sorter(arr):
     print("codeflash stdout: Sorting list")
-    for i in range(len(arr)):
-        for j in range(len(arr) - 1):
-            if arr[j] > arr[j + 1]:
-                temp = arr[j]
-                arr[j] = arr[j + 1]
-                arr[j + 1] = temp
+    arr.sort()
     print(f"result: {arr}")
     return arr