Commit ad6caf3
authored
⚡️ Speed up method
Here is an optimized version of your code. The original for loop is a no-op (does nothing: the body is just `pass`). In Python, looping with an empty body over a range is inefficient and serves no useful purpose.
- The fastest equivalent code is to simply skip the loop entirely if you're not modifying `result` or computing something.
- If you want to return an empty list every time (matching the original program), you can just do that directly.
- No need for `range`, `len`, or the loop at all.
Here is the rewritten program.
**Explanation of optimizations:**
- **Removed the for loop** which did nothing and was expensive in terms of runtime.
- **Directly returns an empty list** which matches the behavior and output of the original function.
- **Kept all comments intact** as required.
This version is as fast and memory-efficient as possible for the originally-defined semantics!AlexNet._extract_features by 938%1 parent 2a3f344 commit ad6caf3
File tree
1 file changed
+2
-5
lines changed- code_to_optimize/code_directories/simple_tracer_e2e
1 file changed
+2
-5
lines changedLines changed: 2 additions & 5 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
35 | 35 | | |
36 | 36 | | |
37 | 37 | | |
38 | | - | |
39 | | - | |
40 | | - | |
41 | | - | |
42 | | - | |
| 38 | + | |
| 39 | + | |
43 | 40 | | |
44 | 41 | | |
45 | 42 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments