Commit ceafe7e
authored
⚡️ Speed up method
Here's the **optimized version** of your code.
Your original for-loop only iterated and did nothing (contained just `pass`). To optimize such a case, **do not loop at all**—the loop is entirely unnecessary and is the biggest cost observed in the profile.
If this loop is a placeholder for future feature extraction (the "real" code), you should only optimize so far as this placeholder allows.
But based on what's given, here's the more efficient version (no-op extraction).
**Explanation**.
- The original method performed no computation, just created and returned an empty list after looping over input.
- The optimized version immediately returns the empty list, entirely eliminating the unnecessary loop.
This is now O(1) runtime regardless of `x`.
**Line profile time will no longer be spent inside the unusable loop.**
If in the future you add real feature extraction inside the loop, consider vectorized operations with NumPy or appropriate PyTorch/TensorFlow ops to optimize further. Let me know if you need help with that!AlexNet._extract_features by 663%1 parent 030e1e5 commit ceafe7e
File tree
1 file changed
+4
-7
lines changed- code_to_optimize/code_directories/simple_tracer_e2e
1 file changed
+4
-7
lines changedLines changed: 4 additions & 7 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
29 | 29 | | |
30 | 30 | | |
31 | 31 | | |
32 | | - | |
33 | | - | |
34 | | - | |
35 | | - | |
36 | | - | |
| 32 | + | |
| 33 | + | |
37 | 34 | | |
38 | 35 | | |
39 | | - | |
40 | | - | |
| 36 | + | |
| 37 | + | |
41 | 38 | | |
42 | 39 | | |
43 | 40 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments