⚡️ Speed up method AlexNet._extract_features by 623%
#421
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 623% (6.23x) speedup for
AlexNet._extract_featuresincode_to_optimize/code_directories/simple_tracer_e2e/workload.py⏱️ Runtime :
36.1 microseconds→5.00 microseconds(best of386runs)📝 Explanation and details
Here is an optimized version of your program.
for i in range(len(x)):with a more Pythonic and efficient way usingrangeonly if needed, or better, used no-ops directly since the for loop is entirely a no-op (passinside).xis large, looping does use CPU;resultis always an empty list, so the function may as well skip unnecessary looping.If the logic is meant to be a placeholder, it can be reduced to a minimal form that does the same work.
If you expect to implement something in the loop later, but for now want it fast, this is optimal.
If you are actually meant to process
xlater, let me know what it should do, but as written, your function just always returns an empty list, and the for loop is just wasted runtime.✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-AlexNet._extract_features-mccvaepvand push.